Christian Revenge Tragedy

289 Words2 Pages
Stephen Greenblatt has said that the Christian idea of Purgatory is “utterly incompatible with a Senecan call for vengeance.” Yet that did not stop playwrights from creating dozens of revenge tragedies in a Christian milieu during the English Renaissance. Basing their works on the model of Seneca, both in his violent dramaturgy and in his Stoic philosophy, these theatre practitioners wrote works of bloody spectacle and moral ambiguity, considering how different the ethical framework of the Christian world was from that of Ancient Rome. Yet, no less a Catholic theologian than Saint Thomas Aquinas postulated that vengeance could be lawful “so long as all proper conditions are safeguarded.” Examining the work of Thomas Kyd, John Marston, William Shakespeare, and Cyril Tourneur, this paper attempts to locate within the plays of the period an example of a worldview where Christianity, violence, and revenge can co-exist reasonably and to great popular effect. This selection of “Revengers” casts a wide net both in temperament and in apparent religious background: Hieronimo appears to live in a pagan eschatology; Antonio can be read as Catholic, Hamlet as Protestant; D’amville is, of course, an atheist. Through these different perspectives, the Renaissance playwrights have created a body of work that is not monolithic in its approach to religion and violence, yet one that shares many tropes and thematic elements. It is perhaps no surprise that these tragedies became immensely successful to an English audience whose unified religious identity had in living memory been shattered by the Reformation. The violence of the plays, coupled with their religious content, provide a tension that is at once understandable in its appeal to the confused masses and one that presumably served a highly cathartic function as

More about Christian Revenge Tragedy

Open Document