Analyze the following case study and determine how the evidence could be documented Three people were involved in the robbery of a local computer store – the defendant, an unknown masked accomplice who entered the store with him and the driver of an automobile that the trio used to get away. A passerby noticed the plates of that vehicle as the robbery was in progress and reported it to the police. The vehicle was later traced and discovered to have been stolen two days before the robbery. The car was recovered and the defendant’s fingerprints were found on the passenger door panel. 1.
McKenzie Pennington Mrs. Vonnegut Evidence and Procedure U.S. Vs Harrison US Vs. Harrison In this case the defendant, Johnny James Harrison was being watched on surveillance by agent Brenneman because of suspicion of drugs and firearms. During his surveillance on the defendant the agent did not see any evidence of illegal activity so he decided to “knock and talk”. A knock and talk procedure is a tactic used by one or two police officers to confront a person about the allegations that they were accused of when there is no probable cause to get a search warrant. Sometimes a knock and talk will result in the police asking to search with verbal consent from the owner. In this case Agent Brenneman knocked on Harrison’s door and told him the police had received an anonymous tip that there were bombs and drugs in his apartment.
His partner, Detective Yu, would cover for him in Shanghai while he was away. While in the US, Inspector Chen discreetly continued his investigations while serving his duty as a delegation head. Then one day, their delegation interpreter, Little Huang, was beaten to death near their hotel. The local police thought it was a failed robbery, but Inspector Chen suspected that it was murder, and HE was the real target. Chen had to be really careful in his investigation.
Black Hat or White Hat There are multiple examples of people convicted of major crimes working with law enforcement to help convict other people doing similar crimes. In fact, the perpetrator of the ZZZZ Best case was released from his sentence because of all the good he was perceived to have done against subsequent frauds. Is using convicted criminals to fight future crimes a good idea? Explain with an example. Disc7 Accounting Black Hat or White Hat Student Name: Institution Name: Abstract A criminal investigation involves seeking, collecting, and gathering evidence for a criminal case.
So that’s when Internal Affairs (I.A.) comes in to investigate. It’s not too hard to figure out that a police officer is spending money that they shouldn’t have. Then you do interrogations and find out that a group of police officers have been raiding drug houses and steeling the cash and drugs then selling these drugs back for more cash. Police officers get sloppy and start
Police corruption has increased dramatically with the illegal cocaine trade, with officers acting alone or in-groups to steal money from dealers or distribute cocaine themselves. Large groups of corrupt police have been caught in New York, New Orleans, Washington, DC, and Methodology: Corruption within police departments falls into two basic categories, which are external corruption and internal corruption. In this report I will concentrate only on external corruption because it has been the larger center of attention recently. I have decided to include the fairly recent accounts of corruption from a few major cities, mainly Detroit and Dearborn, because that is where I have lived for all my life. My ideas and examples have come straight from the book, along with some.
Stop and search: police powers A police officer has powers to stop and search you if they have ‘reasonable grounds’ to suspect you’re carrying: * Illegal drugs * A weapon * Stolen property * Something which could be used to commit a crime, eg a crowbar You can only be stopped and searched without reasonable grounds if it has been approved by a senior police officer. This can happen if it is suspected that: * Serious violence could take place * You’re carrying a weapon or have used one * You’re in a specific location or area Before you’re searched Before you’re searched the police officer must tell you: * Their name and police station * What they expect to find, e.g. drugs * The reason they want to search you, e.g. it looks like you’re hiding something * Why they are legally allowed to search you * That you can have a record of the search and if this isn’t possible at the time, how you can get a
Police officer need a warrant to search a person, no matter who he is. I support the first opinion, I believe the police officers are protector of people rights, but sometimes they need to invade certain person’s own right to protect the whole society. Police officer can search without warrant in three cases, “The first, called the “plain view doctrine,” refers to situations in which the police, during the course of legal police business, see something of interest in plain view, for example, if a police officer on duty on the street, and see someone sitting in the car and use illegal drug, he can seize the evidence without the warrant. Second, the police can also legally conduct a warrantless search if you give permission for them to do so. Finally, a police officer can conduct a “search incident to arrest” without a warrant.
Nathan is tricked out of his home by ‘Killer’ Evans who goes into it to find an abandoned printing press with counterfeit bank notes of an old criminal who occupied the house before Nathan. Evans knew about this printing press and made up the entire rouse to get Nathan away in hopes of getting to the money without killing Nathan to do it. There’s a general theme of brotherhood and loyalty from Watson and Holmes in this story, in my opinion. At one point, in response to John Garrideb’s question as to whether Watson needed to know some details, Holmes states:“We usually work together.” Another phrase i found which supports my claim on the general theme is; “By the Lord, it is as well for you. If you had
Interviews and Interrogation: Robbery Rosalyn Romero Donis CJE2580-13 Everest University Online While working as a police officer, you respond to a robbery in progress involving two armed suspects at a liquor store. Upon arrival, you and your partner interview three witnesses to the crime. While conducting your investigation, another unit informs you they have a possible suspect detained several blocks from the incident. The first and most important step in any crime scene investigation is to secure the scene. The most common contamination results from police, EMS, victims and witnesses.