Centralia No. 5 Analysis

1062 Words5 Pages
An Analysis of Logistical Alternatives for Centralia No. 5 Dr. Timothy Smith PAD 500 28 October 2012 An Analysis of Logistical Alternatives for Centralia No. 5 As the end of the shift approaches for the miners in Centralia Coal Co’s Mine No. 5, coal dust exploded deep inside killing 111 men. This explosion forced public officials on the state and federal levels to revise how protocols are implemented. During World War II, this mine provided coal to the war effort and was a sense of job security for most males. Aware of the dangers of working 540 feet below ground, the miners still took the risk to provide for their families. Employment options were limited and working in the coal mine was an end to a mean. There are still controversies…show more content…
After the first cleanup, Scanlan should have noted that the greatest methane danger is when the mine is inactive for a period of time. According to (Hartley & Kenney, 2006), after a long interruption of work, or in a particularly gassy mine, more methane accumulates, and people are killed in this process. However, even more people are killed if safety precautions are neglected. Secondly, Scanlan could have contacted the local news station or newspaper to report the negligence of the mine owners. Prior to the blast, the leaders of United Mine Workers Local 52 wrote to the governor, complaining of conditions in No. 5, so this information was public. Third, Scanlan, composed a strategy for the mine workers to strike until the recommendations are met. Finally, if all else fails, he could have simply shut down the ill-maintained mine; even though he had fear that he would be fired and that a more negligent inspector would replace…show more content…
His values were based on the age old form of government; bureaucracy. This form government provides order, dependability, and stability. According to (Weber, 1922), a bureaucracy establishes a relation between legally instated authorities and their subordinate officials which is characterized by defined rights and duties, prescribed in written regulations; authority relations between positions, which are ordered systematically; appointment and promotion based on contractual agreements. As a leader in the public sector, Scanlan’s ethical standards of public leaders conformed to standards higher than those aligned with personal morality. In his commentary,(Gawthrop 2005) states that “as a government systems become more commonplace, the responsibility for promoting the ethical moral values of democracy rests most directly on the public managers and policymakers of democratic systems”. Scanlan believes that to uphold ethical principles in public administration is the concern of the political leaders, who make the laws and policies of the state, but these principles need to be morally implemented by the public service. Public officials must accept their role to distinguish the difference interested not of their own interest, but of the general public. One must also be able to
Open Document