MLA Research Paper (Daly) Daly 1 Angela Daly Professor Chavez English 101 14 March XXXX A Call to Action: Title is centered. Regulate Use of Cell Phones on the Road When a cell phone goes off in a classroom or at a concert, we Opening sentences catch readers? are irritated, but at least our lives are not endangered. When we attention. are on the road, however, irresponsible cell phone users are more than irritating: They are putting our lives at risk.
Privacy invaded? Ever since the NSA, National Security Agency, has started to track and scan citizen’s private phone calls and electronic messages people have been concerned about the privacy of their technology, they feel that it is a violation to their fourth amendment. People being watched and spied on for only a reason of suspicion; is a violation because the citizens have the right to a reasonable search and seizures. Therefore, I do not agree with the government unreasonably spying. The fourth amendment states guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.
According to Larry Greenemeier, a recent court case, Carpenter V. United States "specifically pits the privacy of information that wireless devices share with their service providers-the towers or " cell sites" devices connect to, the phone numbers they call and answer, and the time and length of those calls-against law enforcement's authority to retrieve that data without a warrant." However, the FBI issued court orders under the 1986 SCA in order to compel carriers to turn that information over to the FBI. This would be acceptable despite the fact that a warrant requires more reasoning to receive. If they felt strongly enough that they had reason to obtain certain information, they should have to convince a judge to see the situation from the same point of view. “ Without a warrant, but with the SCA court order in hand-the FBI compelled MetroPCS to provide about four months of location records for a smartphone owned by suspect Timothy Ivory Carpenter.” Based off of the information the authorities had previously, it would not have been hard to convince a judge to issue them a warrant.
I will also describe the main findings of the article and point out the real world applications that it contains. The main hypothesis within the research article deals with what part of conversing on a cellular phone interferes with paying attention to traffic signals and more efficient driving altogether. Most people believe, and in fact even people in congress for many laws have been established because of this hypothesis, that using a cellular phone interferes with effective and safe driving because of the peripheral factors. Peripheral factors deal with things like dialing the numbers, holding the phone or hanging up. However the main focus of this paper was to demonstrate that the peripheral factors may not be the risky part of driving and holding cellular conversations after all but rather the attentional factors; the conversation itself.
Re-Directing- Re-Directing calls are available on my telephone. This is so I can forward a call to my other colleagues and I do this by pressing the 'transfer' button on my telephone. Answer phone- The answer phone enables me to hear recorded messages I have received when me or my colleagues are not available Text messaging- I use text messaging sometimes on my telephone system in the office when I know people are able to pick the messages up. The reasons I identify the purpose of a call before I make it is so that the person on the receiving end of the line is clear of who they are speaking to before they engage in the rest of the conversation. In the office, I obtain numbers by storing them in a call log when I first ask for their details whilst on the phone.
Moreover, the chat on the cellphone is what distracts people. If texting while driving is eventually banned in the United States, could it be enforced? Some argue that police cannot enforce drivers who text. Although, this method is direct there is another strategy that enforces drivers who text. The high visibility mobilization strategy is a method that the government uses to aware people of new laws.
SP180.0.2 Principles of Public Speaking Assignment 6_07 Why Banning the use of cell phones while driving should be mandatory nationwide March 23,2014 Banning the use of cell phones while driving should be mandatory nationwide Our phones today have gotten to smart for our own good . Most citizens own a smartphone and are always on them. Playing games, texting, emailing etc. But the biggest problem I see are people using their phones while driving down the road causing serious distractions! There putting in more time and attention to there cell phones and not the road causing fatalities.
Since RIM’s CEO, Mike Lazaridis did not respond, NTP filed a lawsuit. RIM believed their actions were a nuisance and represented patent trolling. The company considered NTP’s lawsuit a counter-action from lawsuit they filed for patents for integrated electronic mailboxes against Glenayre Electronics. In a press release RIM deemed NTP’s filing as unsubstantiated and assured everyone information they had was retrieved from their website. During litigation, RIM attorneys showed proof of wireless email dated back to 1988.
This was then said to be justified because the car was on public streets so the fourth amendment doesn’t apply. The court of appeals denied the argument implying that you can’t track a person’s movements for an extensive amount of time, because the government would gather more information about your everyday life, then just the location of the car. The Constitution is potentially violated in this case because the use of privacy-invading technologies. Providing the courts with all the evidence reveals this case as an unconstitutional search. This illustrates the conflict between the freedom of individual privacy and the order from the government’s political values.
Perceiving the situation from the NSA’s point of view made me think outside the box for some time, though I’m still very mad… But being at this psychological state of mind will not lead anyone to a better thinking process. Anyways, closer to what I wanted to share with you guys. My guess is that the government is using this technique to actually capture terrorists. As funny as this sounds, I am happy that the government works this way. After all, if not the NSA, then who has the power to prevent terrorists from this country?