Case Sturdy Essay

325 Words2 Pages
Taser International, Inc. V. Steve Ward Arizona Supreme Courthe clip on camera device Decided: May 13, 2010 Steve Ward was employed at Taser International, Inc. during January 2004 to July 2007 as vice president of marketing and international sales. During Ward’s time employed at Taser, he did not signed any contracts. Then later, Ward decided to investigate if he could develop an eyeglass mounted camera personally and sought legal advice on December 2006. After his resignation he decided to explored the concept of clip on camera device, after he learned the eyeglass mounted camera was taken. He developed the idea of clip on camera device, starting a new business, and launched it on August 2007. On May 2008, Taser launched AXON, that provides audio video record of an incident and sued Ward for breaching the duty of loyalty and fiduciary duty. Taser claimed that Ward used design and development from Taser’s resources to develop his product. On the other hand, Ward allegated that before his resignation, his activities in developing a new business were lawful. Did Steve Ward directly competed with Taser before resigning? Did Ward improperly used Taser’s materials and confidential information? No, Ward was not found guilty of competing because first, there was no agreement were it restricted of competing. No, Ward did not improperly used Taser’s material and confidential information when developing his product. The development of the clip on camera device did not used any resources, information from Taser. The court declined Taser’s suit because wasn’t able to provide evidence that Ward used specific information in developing his product. Also because there wasn’t any agreement between Taser and Ward, were it restricted the employee from competing in a future with the employer. I agree with the court’s decision because when Ward came with the

More about Case Sturdy Essay

Open Document