Case of Neurototin

477 Words2 Pages
The Case of Neurontin Juan Jesus Lopez RES/351 January 23, 2013 Edward Balian The Case of Neurontin “The goal of ethics in research is to ensure that no one is harmed or suffers adverse consequences from research activities.” (Cooper & Schindler, 2011). In the article of Neurontin written by Dr. Ramirez De Arellano, she discusses the unethical practice of, “selective outcome reporting”, conducted by pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Parke-Davis. Neurontin, which is the brand name for gabapentin, is prescribed for the treatment of epilepsy. Some physicians prescribe Neurontin for, “off-label”, uses such as insomnia, migraines, bipolar disorder, and restless leg syndrome. In some cases off-label uses often exceed the intended use, which in turn becomes very profitable for the pharmaceutical manufacturer. “In 2004, sales of the drug peaked at $2.7 billion. But that same year Pfizer was found to be urging physicians to prescribe Neurontin for off-label uses, which is illegal. As a result, the company had to pay $430 million in criminal fines and civilian penalties.” (Arellano, 2013). Since it would be beneficial to companies to get approval from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), companies will conduct research studies on the effects of these other conditions. “Occasionally, research specialists may be asked by sponsors to participate in unethical behavior.” (Cooper & Schindler, 2011). The legal case against Neurontin exposed the unethical behavior that Pfizer and Parke-Davis partook in. Some of which are discussed in, “Business Research Methods”, written by Cooper and Schindler. * Changing data or creating false data to meet a desired objective. * Changing data presentations or interpretations. * Omitting sections of data analysis and conclusions. * Making recommendations beyond the scope of the data collected. These
Open Document