What other options would you consider? 4. What would you say to the sales representative at Tallant? Do you think they could match the deal with Saxton? 5.
Tripp (1993) also states that critical incidents are ‘not all dramatic or obvious- they are mostly straight forward accounts of very commonplace events’ (Tripp 1993:25). Tripp’s (1993) method involves several different levels of thought process to create a critical incident. This should include a description of the incident, suggestions to why this happened, the incident putting into context, a proposal of a general meaning, then giving one’s own perspective on the incident. Moving onto analysing the incident based on Tripp’s thinking strategies. Elliott (2004) supports Tripp and describes a critical incident as a positive or negative experience when a person pauses to consider an event and tries to come up with a reason for it happening.
A. What factors should have been considered by Nichols in the risk analysis prepared during the planning phase of the audit? Screening process in the planning phase of the audit would have helped Nichols in determining the following factors: ➢ Nature of the Test ➢ Timing of the test ➢ How extent the Test needs to be Inherent Risk at an account level and overall financial level should have been assessed at the planning phase. Some of the other factors that were needed to be considered by Nichols were: ➢ What risks are present in their business that makes it a risky venture? ➢ Risk associated with the type of product they carry, company may carry products that went obsolete.
4. Viewpoint and perspectives What are you implying by that? What effect would that have? What is an alternative? 5.
19 List the strengths and weaknesses of the system and its related reports for the purpose management uses the system’s output. 20 What recommendations, if any, would you make to Waters regarding the company’s cost accounting system and its related reports? 21 Q1.Do you agree with Water’s decision to keep product 103? In order to support an opinion on the side we decided to analyze all the probable scenarios. If the company management decided that it is better to stop the production of product 103, they could do this in one of the following manners: 1.
Use the word “because” to connect your judgment to your reasons. Example: The films of Kevin Smith, from Clerks through Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, should be avoided because the humor is sophomoric, the language offensive, and the dialogue crowded with unintelligible pop-culture references. Body of Argument Reason One • First Criteria. State, as a topic sentence, your judgment on the first evaluative criteria, and use appropriate transition words/phrases to move from thesis to first reason. Also, restate the wording of the first reason so it doesn’t simply copy the reason as you stated it in the complete thesis.
Defects in marketing have to do with the improper instructions and failures to warn consumer of latent dangers in the product. Product liability is usually judged as a strict liability offense. Strict liability wrongs are not concerned with how careful the defendant was. Converted to products liability terms, a defendant is liable when it is revealed that the product is defective. It is immaterial the
For a conscientious observer, this double standard should seriously cause him to question the ability of a consequentialist perspective to prescribe satisfactory moral understanding and guidance. By accommodating an agent’s moral feelings only when they are in accord with utility is indicative of a deeper failure to recognize that such feelings are often expressions of the agent’s own projects and commitments. Thus, to achieve an objective standard of right action, utilitarianism ultimately sacrifices the agent’s integrity by making right action irrelevant to those projects and commitments. The first part of my exposition focuses on what Williams sees as the reason for the popularity of consequentialist ethical theories, which is rooted in an illicit jump from thinking about moral kinds of actions to thinking about moral degrees of outcomes. The rest of my exposition explains how this jump directly leads to the
All these techniques are used alone or in combinations with each other in the health research domain to effectively de-identify data. The Suppression technique refers to the removal of certain data features if it is considered dangerous, and leads to re-identification (Magna & Leonardo, 2013). An example of supressed data are names, phone numbers, ZIP codes, and some unique characteristics as “president of York University” or the “professor of chemistry at York University” (Magna & Leonardo, 2013). All of these are considered direct identifiers and are dangerous to keep as they can be narrowed down to some individual. De-identifying the mentioned identifiers will not reduce the quality of the research paper especially in the health research domain field as names, zip codes, phone numbers, and titles are neither important nor related to health data researches (Fraser, R., & Willison, D.,
With these aspects in mind, the authors offer recommendations that would limit the effects of biases including full divestiture of consulting and tax services, prohibit auditors from taking positions with the firms they audit, removing the threat of being fired, and educate auditors so they understand how and why biases effect their decisions. I found the study conducted by Cain et al. on the effects of disclosing conflict of interest very fascinating. I was surprised that disclosure of the advisors motive to mislead the estimators did not cause the estimators to substantially discount their advisor’s advice. I would think that disclosing the advisors motives would have a greater impact on the estimator’s decision.