Case in Point Analysis

989 Words4 Pages
Case-In-Point Analysis Jacqueline Johnson University of Phoenix Environment Issues and Ethics SCI/362 Mark Leeper April 30, 2012 Case-In-Point Analysis The argument of animal rights raises many and varying points of view. In the article “Animal Rights What’s in a name?” Tome Regan draws a connection between the Deep Ecology movement and animal rights proponents, which could be a considered a uniting force between the two groups which have fundamentally been opposed. To fully appreciate Regan’s argument one must understand the that Deep Ecology perceives animals as a resource and the protection of the environment extends to these resources, thus the protection animals is by default derived from conservation. This view is in contradiction to animal welfares that believe that animals are not resources but living entities with inherent rights. The linchpin argument that Regan provides is that the fundamental idea of protecting animals is a unifying force. As a result of sport hunting and commercial usage of animals many species have been endangered and some driven to extinction. Urban sprawl and depletion of natural habitats such as the rain forest have been factors contributing to the loss of animal life. From these problems the obvious implications of depleting species seems clear. The unbalancing of nature has led to many situations where humans have endangered themselves by creating unsustainable environments. Case in point is the overfishing of lakes which unbalances the ecosystem by removing fish which provide other animals with sustainability. This scenario has played out repeatedly. Science and technology has offered many solutions to these problems and especially when concerning animal rights. Today it is possible to restock lakes with fish and by controlling periods of hunting animals is not driven downward in population to dangerous levels.

More about Case in Point Analysis

Open Document