Case 2.3 Happiness Express

712 Words3 Pages
Case 2.3: Happiness Express, Inc. 1. The primary audit objectives used by auditors to accomplish by confirming a client’s year-end accounts receivable is stated in SAS No. 67, the Confirmation Process. The assertions used by this standard include existence or occurrence, completeness, and valuation. The existence assertion is to make sure that the client and accounts exist, the completeness is to make sure that all of the balances are recorded, and the valuation is to make sure that the balances are recorded at the correct amount. It is important that the auditor obtains a confirmation from a third party for the information in accounts receivables. After communicating and obtaining the information, the auditor is to evaluate the information (SAS No. 67, AU Section 330.11). The audit objectives auditors use to perform year-end sales cutoff tests are to determine if the information they obtained by the confirmation reduces the audit risk level. This has a heavy emphasis on the materiality of the account being assessed, and the lower the audit risk the better. The sales cutoff tests are usually performed based on the existence and completeness assertions regarding the accounts receivable balance (SAS No. 67, AU Section 330.09). 2. Coopers & Lybrand did make a couple of mistakes in their audit at the fiscal year ended 1995. First, they looked over the receivable from Wow Wee and also from West Coast Liquidators, which was not chosen when Coopers & Lybrand did its confirmation process. Also, when Goldberg faxed a forged copy of confirmation to Coopers & Lybrand, they accepted it without taking the necessary follow-up procedures. Lastly, in the sales cutoff test, they did not notice the bogus sales to West Coast Liquidators during the final month of 1995, or the bogus sales to Wow Wee on the last day of 1995. The mistakes made by Coopers & Lybrand

More about Case 2.3 Happiness Express

Open Document