Carlos Ghosn Nissan

571 Words3 Pages
Carlos Ghosn having been named CEO of Nissan in 1999, the company was experiencing a loss of $6 billion annually. Additionally the company’s massive debts and a damaged brand necessitated the input of Ghosn. It was important for the company’s state to be understood before the strategies that the CEO had could be implemented. Therefore, Ghosn firstly determined how deep the financial stagnation had reached. As an initial step of the mitigating the financial exposures, the management defined the corporate philosophy and objectives. Among the planned objectives were, reducing purchasing costs by 20%, displacing 20,000 –odd workers via layoffs and attrition, closing five plants and reduce capacity by 30 percent. After identifying the exposures, the management were expected to quantify the level of effect to the company’s operations. Among the categories of exposures in the company were, translational, transactional and operating exposure. However, the financial stagnation was an operational exposure which was economic in nature and arose from foreign competition. Although the identification and measurement was successful, the capturing of the exposure is difficult compared to the other two exposures (Napolo, 2005). Once the exposure has been quantified, the definition of risk management policies and procedures helps during the hedging process. In the process, a range of acceptable hedging activity should be established in order for each aspect of the exposure to be addressed. Strategies for risk management are identified ensuring that approved derivative strategies reflect established procedures. Examples of derivative strategies include forward contracts, forward-equivalent option-combination strategies, and purchased options. For Nissan, purchased options and option-combining strategies were applicable as the competitive international environment necessitated an
Open Document