Capital Punishment - an Argumentative Piece.

899 Words4 Pages
Capital punishment, which is also known as the “Death Penalty” can be vividly defined as the executioner of a person by certain judicial process in relation to the severe punishment given for an offence, Also the crimes that may lead to the death penalty are called Capital offences. Capital Punishment is seen in practice in almost every layer of society, therefore it can be considered as a universal phenomenon or perhaps next to same. It now looks like a matter of vivid controversy in different countries and nations. This issue can also differ in different cultural religions or even within a particular ideology of politics. It is to be noted that in the EU member states, Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits the use of capital punishment. Now talking about the relationship between an individual behavior patterns and the parallel system of transferring punishment, one can infer that men learn a lot from his surroundings and therefore the issue of whether or not to punish the humans and give them capital punishment is altogether a debatable question . At birth man was not equipped with the art of committing crime and there were no errors associated with them. It was in due course of time that they adopted what their surroundings taught them. The environment in which the people reside along with the society should be blamed for all the evils .Man only practice what his family and society teaches him. Whatever basics are taught to him is dependent on the futuristic morals and the ethics of human beings. In spite of punishing such people it should be better to reform them as they can be converted into a better human being, Taking an example of an infant it can, it can be noted that is clearly free of every inclination and sentiments . He is just like a blank slate on which anything can be scribbled. On that slate, whatever is

More about Capital Punishment - an Argumentative Piece.

Open Document