Building Identity Trough Adaptation

1216 Words5 Pages
Building Identity Trough Adaptation In her short essay, “Two Ways to Belong in America,” Bharati Mukherjee insists, “My sister is an expatriate, professionally generous and creative, socially courteous and gracious, and that’s as far as her Americanization can go. She is here to maintain an identity, not transform it” (Mukherjee 2). Mukherjee’s statement focuses on the significant yet controversial aspect of assimilation into American culture. While some Americans claim that immigrants into the United States should fully assimilate and abandon past cultural values like Bharati Mukherjee assimilates, others favor clinging onto cultural values from one’s home country (Mukherjee 1). Decisions to assimilate teach newcomers how to behave in manners acceptable in the United States; however, rather than using the term assimilation, the better term is adaptation which, unlike assimilation, suggests finding equilibrium between retaining one’s past identity yet still accepting and submitting to new cultural values that are acceptable in the new country—those being English fluency and new traditions. While some proponents would argue that forcing assimilation into the United States denies freedom of expression, ultimately the government does not suppress values of different ethnic groups. Therefore, United States residents should be able to adopt new traditions more acceptable in this country while still having the choice to hold onto past traditions from their old world culture. Although the United States celebrates ethnic diversity, certain circumstances such as school, the workplace, and media require people to understand English. Granted, the nation has no official language, as English is only its de facto language (Shin and Bruno 1).However, as the 2000 U.S census bureau explains, “The ability to communicate with government and private service providers, schools,
Open Document