Bring Back Flogging Analysis

606 Words3 Pages
Don’t Bring Back Flogging Throughout the seventeenth century, flogging was a general sentence for the people convicted among the Boston’s Puritans’. According to Jeff Jacoby of the Boston Globe, flogging was the punishment then, and was still the punishment for criminals in Delaware until 1972. Thankfully that time period has passed and the ruthlessness and cruelty of flogging has been replaced with imprisonment. Jacoby in his article Bring Back Flogging declares that flogging is better than imprisonment, a much less costly means of punishment, while trying to convenience us that flogging would change the course of a convict’s life. This has introduced a whole new form of inhuman cruelty and society should wholeheartedly disagree with this type of treatment of human beings. First, Jacoby mistakenly presumes that flogging can keep juvenile delinquents’ from taking up a life as a career criminal if he was publicly horse-whipped. This is really a pathetic analysis. There are statics showing that gangs initiate new members to painful and humiliating beatings by older gang members. If flogging would come back in this century and be legalized like Jacoby presume it should be it would open the door for more violence and humiliation by anyone and everyone and most…show more content…
His failings include the real value of imprisonment, the false hood of the risk of being raped or murdered; the simple reality that the author fails to see is that violence promotes more violence. As humans we need to stop the violence at all cost, in our schools, in our work place, etc. Flogging or horse-whipping publicly will not do that. We as human beings need not to revert back to Puritan times as Jacoby suggest, but to find answer to control the overcrowding we have in our prison today and to help those that are coming out of the prisons to make sure they stay
Open Document