Describe why it is essential that the mentor has good communication skills Good communication is integral to the mentor-mentee relationship; therefore the ability to communicate effectively is essential. Mentoring involves a lot of discussions and open conversations between the mentor and the mentee, therefore the mentor should know how to effectively get the message across to the individual with ease. This is especially important during the giving of feedback to the mentee. The mentor must be able to relay feedback and remarks constructively and positively without demeaning the mentor’s self-esteem. Good communication skills, such as active listening and questioning skills are essential for the mentor to ensure that learner fully understand what being discussed.
Will promote confidence and will also help gain friendships. * Promoting choices and rights It will help an individual to think and do things for themselves encouraging them to be in charge of their own safety.
treating the individual as you would want to be treated. 1.3 Compare the difference in outcomes that may occur between focusing on an individual’s strengths and aspirations rather than their needs only. Key points Strengths-based approaches value the capacity, skills, knowledge, connections and potential in individuals and communities. Focusing on strengths does not mean ignoring challenges, or spinning struggles into strengths. Practitioners working in this way have to work in collaboration - helping people to do things for themselves.
This will require that I understand and build on the non-verbal clues conveyed by the team, responding accordingly in order to make a connection on a level that works for them. Lastly, my plan should develop so as to allow me to interact with the team on a more social level, perhaps spending time outside the office. My interaction with them on a more personal level should help me feel more relaxed in their collective presence, while retaining a personal connection. Ultimately, as I gain confidence with them, my enthusiastic and positive view of our employees as a whole will take hold in their minds, providing some offset to their wholly analytical views and logical
When you work in a way that embeds person-centred values you are supporting the people you work with so that they can live the life that they choose to. You will have a more holistic approach to your work by respecting a person’s differences and tasks will be done better because you have accounted for that person needs in a way that suits them. As a result the individual will feel valued. Why can risk taking be part of a person centred approach? A person centred approach includes promoting an individuals right to choose and be independent.
Unit 98 Support Person-Centred Thinking and Planning 1.1 Person-centred thinking is based on the individual, planning on their priorities, working towards the individuals goals, building a circle of support, planning with them, supporting the individuals wishes and hopes. Reviewing and updating plans with the individual to maximise success. Enable changes of direction when required, listening to the individual and to encourage individualisation in a non judgemental manner. 1.2 The benefits of Person-centred thinking are putting the individual first, supporting individuals to make their own decisions, enabling fruitful relationships, increase the individuals feeling of worth, increase confidence and self esteem, enable and encourage the individuals involvement in the community and to promote their involvement in future planning. 1.3 The beliefs and values of Person-centred thinking is based Rogers, core conditions, encourage a growth promoting climate, Maslow, hierarchy of needs, the work of Michael Smull – essential lifestyle planning, the social model and holistic model, the principle of inclusion.
This essay will discuss Weber’s three ideal types of political authority in detail, relationships between these three types. Then it will give reasons why legal rational authority has become the dominant type in modern societies and identify some drawbacks of Weber’s political authority theory. Before discussing Weber’s three ideal types of political authority, it is important to find the reason why he generates these three types. As he argued that power is a too multidimensional form to define and therefore he specifically concentrates on domination and distinguishes two main types of it. One of them is the domination by the authority of office, which showed a strong need for obedience from power (Allen, 2004).
Coercive Power Coercive power is based on the fear of consequences when the person does not follow instructions of their leader. This type of fear can be a physical or mental pain discomfort based on the frustrations of the unknown. Conceive power can be displayed by threats of loosing job and privileges, being demoted and other types of consequential actions. Coercive power could also be used to conceal key information (Robbins & Judge, 2007). Employee 2 could possibly use conceive power based on how valuable he is his position to get more pay or even better schedule than the one he requested or other job advantages.
[Bakunin, The Political Philosophy of Bakunin, p. 249] This distinction between forms of authority is important. As Erich Fromm pointed out, "authority" is "a broad term with two entirely different meanings: it can be either 'rational' or 'irrational' authority. Rational authority is based on competence, and it helps the person who leans on it to grow. Irrational authority is based on power and serves to exploit the person subjected to it." [To Have or To Be, pp.
This essay will criticise negative and positive freedom, outlining the concepts of them and their relevance to the concept of democracy. The argument as to whether negative freedom is functional can be motivated by looking at the ideological movement’s, namely freedom, sub- section’s strengths and weaknesses. Limitations on negative freedom are imposed by a person and not by the interference/ decisions made by the government. Coercive law manages to reduce the degree of people’s freedom (Pettit, 1989:1). These restrictions are seen in this case as external and limitations are brought forward by the actions and decisions made by other people.