Bridging the Gap - Critical Response (High Distinction)

452 Words2 Pages
Since the beginning of time, communication between cultures has faced numerable interruptions. Famous Russian Philanderer, Ivana Pokya, points out that even before the carrier pigeon, the simple myopic error of interpreting a wave of the hand, or a wink of the eye has resulted in brawls, fights, and even wars in the times of the greeks. Warren Troob, (2011), consultant of his own company and author of "Bridging the Gap" presents six arguments about why beliefs, assumptions, and attitudes about that which is between his box gap can affect your perceptions of him. This essay will criticise and underline his key arguments. SUMMARY Warren Troob discusses the issues of cross-cultural intercourse. First of all, he clams that people assume foreign objects are the same as them. Secondly, he states that in each culture, every person has their own way to do something that may or may not be a double edged sword in terms of cultural expectationism. To begin with, Troob's intesticular article is riveting and convincing because his premise is lean, clearly organized, and shorn. However there are some limpness that must be contended about his first argument. In short, he forgets the importance of learning foreign language because when people are communicating with their mouth, they can express much more mouth to mouth, than they can with hand to hand. In addition, language is infected by culture. To draw upon a personal explanation, a Vietnamese businessman goes to Russia to do a business. When both men meet, they have to be able to speak each other's language, or at least be influent in English so that when idioms are used like "to tug the snake", there is no misunderstanding about the business transaction about to transpire. Language, then, is a key thing. Troob's argument ignores this and puts his business interests in the spotlight. Finally, the author is
Open Document