Breast Feeding vs.Bottle Feeding

278 Words2 Pages
Breastfeeding reduces the risks of certain chronic conditions and prevents allergies. According to Brown, Isaacs and Lichtenberg (p.g23), babies need to be fed on breast milk for the first half a year because in this period they need to be immured against infection. Beyond this period, Clark (p.g32) encourages feeding on breast milk for not less than 12 months (Brown, Isaacs, Lichtenberg and Clark, p.g23, 32). A team of researchers from the University of Minnesota Cancer Centre revealed in a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1999) that infants that breastfed for at least one month had a 21% lower risk of developing leukemia and those who breastfed for at least 6 months or longer have up to a 30 percent lower risk of developing leukemia than bottle fed babies (UMCC, 1999). Some experts believe that breastfeeding is the suitable nutritional choice for babies. Firstly, breastfeeding has more nutritional value and ease of digestion (Clark, p.g45). According to Riordan and Wambach (p.g78), the antibodies passed from the mother to the baby can assist in lowering the risks of contracting some condition such as ear infections, respiratory infections, diarrhea and meningitis (Riordan, Wambach, p.g78). In addition, due to the antibodies and immunities passed onto the babies, they fall sick less often than babies fed on bottle. Breast milk contains components such as protein, lactose, and fat, which are easily digestible by the newly developed digestive system of the baby. Also, it is free from contamination, supplying nutrients in the correct amounts. Secondly, breast milk is free; it does not cost any money (Brown, Isaacs and Lichtenberg,

More about Breast Feeding vs.Bottle Feeding

Open Document