Blade Runner

1181 Words5 Pages
A comparative study of two texts, written in two different eras’ shows, quite obviously, the literal differences between them. Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s film Blade Runner explore the same notions danger of technology and strive for knowledge. However, their messages are developed for their respective audiences at a different time; therefore their content has extreme differences, highlighted when studying the two texts together. The texts also have thematic concerns which aren’t explored equally or at all by each other, which is another blatant difference between the texts. Ultimately, the context of the era and the way the author or director display their message are the factors that when comparatively studying the…show more content…
Even after the creature was formed and knowledge’s repercussions were felt by William, Justine, Clerval and Elizabeth, science and knowledge were needed to quell the monster, by, ironically, trying to create another monster. At the time, medicine was being developed more scientifically, boats were being developed, and industrialisation was giving people jobs; so knowledge was in many ways helpful. Shelly in her message tries to show the audience that knowledge is not harmful unless you are not playing the role of god, aware of the consequences, and responsible for the consequences. Frankenstein neglects his creation while Tyrell consistently tries to improve it, by giving it memories and even trying to find a cure for the 4 year ‘use –by’ date. In Blade Runner, technology is repeatedly used as a crotch to solve problems, ironically again, trying to solve the problems it caused, which include the polluted world through the off world colony and it’s resource problems with Replicants. Scott uses a pre-recorded statement, “A new life awaits you on the off world colonies! A chance to begin again in a golden age of opportunity and adventure” with a cliché voice and cheesy slogan to reflect his animosity to the 20th century and it’s increasingly dishonest and greedy approaches to selling products. He tries to reflect the mentality of a certain group of…show more content…
She is commenting on the failures of science to neglect their power. She comments on those in power who have had privileged lives as people who are lucky, compared to those who are not. Shelly tries to push the concept of people being conducive to their environments, using the creature as a scapegoat, “I am malicious because I am miserable”. Shelly again uses the technique of alliteration, in this case m, which has a personal and melancholic connotation, to emphasise the state that the creature is in. Shelly shows that aesthetics, intelligence, happiness and sadness are all conducive to the person’s context. The creature’s aesthetics are conducive to his maker, just like real people because of their parents. His intelligence is founded upon the books he reads and the environment he is in, “I knew and could distinguish nothing...I could hardly describe to you the effect of these books”, just like people in society are, as well by their parents and environments. His happiness and sadness are conducive to his creators love and lack of it, just like many in society. Shelly makes the creature into the symbolic embodiment of neglect by society, neglect by parents and neglect by science. Bladerunner is the polar opposite in many cases. Their aesthetics are strong; Scott made Batty’s hair blonde and gave him blue eyes to reference the Nazi’s ignorant beliefs of superiority. Their intelligence is
Open Document