Autonomy And Informed Consent Case Study

831 Words4 Pages
Chapter 2: Principles of Autonomy and Informed Consent The principle of autonomy states one shall not treat a patient without the informed consent of the patient or his or her lawful surrogate, except in narrowly defined emergencies. The patient’s free will is exercised even though they may not demonstrate the capacity of developing their own decisions. The health care professional, by irrefutable law, is required to respect patient’s rights while providing a clear understanding to the consequences of their decisions. Although some patients are legally incompetent they are still ethically competent to make decisions about their treatment. The informed consent presents the treatment information in an understandable manner in an effort to avoid any misunderstandings leading to a possible delay in care. A lack of understanding opens the door to further communication between the physician and the patient or their appointed surrogate. If the patient has not appointed a surrogate, health care professionals cannot treat a patient against their will unless the courts have appointed a health care surrogate. However, when the wishes of a patient conflict with the decision of their surrogate, the health care provider should revert to their institution’s policy or court intervention. When…show more content…
She is a very lonely 19 year-old woman. She seems to have no interests in life except taking care of her long, red hair and reading. She has been diagnosed as having metastatic ovarian cancer that is not curable. This cancer sometimes responds very well to chemotherapy. If it does not respond to chemotherapy almost immediately, it is fatal and the patient dies within months. The treatments leave a person very weak for a long time and cause hair loss. The physician tells M. of the diagnosis and prognosis without treatment, but tells her nothing of the side effects, lest she choose to refuse

More about Autonomy And Informed Consent Case Study

Open Document