Assess the Impact of the Conflicting Agreements in Contributing to the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

717 Words3 Pages
The ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict is a devastating issue that the world is facing. Throughout the years of 1915, 1916 and 1917 three conflicting agreements were signed that complicated the situation even further. Great Britain signed agreements with the Arabs, McMahon-Hussein Correspondence of 1915, and again with the French, the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, and also the Jews, the Balfour Declaration of 1917. These agreements contradicted each other and promised Jews things that were previously promised to Arabs, and vise versa. Thus, the impact of these conflicting agreements contributed to the Arab-Israeli conflict immensely. The McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, issued in October of 1915, was a series of letters between the Sharif of Mecca, Hussein Bin Ali, and British High Commissioner, Sir Henry McMahon, and it discussed the future of the Middle East’s Arab countries after the conquer of the Ottoman Empire by Great Britain. Great Britain acquired this help from the Arabic people because they believed that their chances of success would be greater if they could enlist the aid of Arabs in the revolt against Ottoman rulers. With Great Britain in support of Arab Independence, the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence gave the Arabs a portion of the Ottoman Empire as a ‘homeland’, it freed the Arabs of Turkish yoke and expelled the Turks from Arab countries. This created some issues as the Jews that were living in Palestine, the preferred home for both Arabs and Jews; it meant that the country would be under direct Arab rule. The Sykes-Picot Agreement of October 1916 was a secret agreement between Great Britain, France and Russia, which divided up the conquered Ottoman Empire. When Russia pulled out of WW1, due to the Bolshevik communist government rising to power, they were removed from the agreement. This agreement completely contradicted the Arab-favouring
Open Document