Argument Around Tom Robinson’s Case and Walter Mamillian’s Case

1089 Words5 Pages
Li 1 Li 1 Echo Li Ms. Hedman English Period 4 2 December 2014 Argument around Tom Robinson’s case and Walter MaMillian’s case There are both similarities and differences between Tom Robinson’s case and McMillian’ case. A significant hypocrisy in To Kill A Mockingbird is Calpurnia’s act of speaking one way around black people and another way around white people. Except four folks in First Purchase read, other folks cannot read. Calpurnia learnt reading from old Miss Burford. The reason for acting in this “dishonest” way is firstly the fact that Calpurnia is black. And secondly Calpurnia knows that she cannot change any of them by talking right. When they do not want to learn, there is nothing she can do but keep her mouth shut or talk their language (Lee). As mentioned in Amendment Six, it is important to have an impartial jury. But in Tom’s case, although the jury is convinced by Atticus and believes that it is Mayella who makes the story up, under racial discrimination, the jury finds Tom guilty. In Walter McMillian’s case, Mr. McMillian had been placed on death row for 15 months before the trail. What’s more the act of coercing witnesses to make false testimony and the act of preventing a lawyer from taking a “designed” case are not supposed to happen. Bryan Stevenson also cannot go into court with the presumption innocent of his client (Stevenson). Ronda Morrison’s murder takes place in Monrcoeville, Alabama, where Harper Lee grew up and wrote To Kill A Mockingbird. People there are crazy about that story. But when Bryan Stevenson tries to get the community to help Walter McMillian, an innocent African-American man, there is only indifference and hostility (Stevenson). Li 2 Li 2 As defendants, Tom Robinson and Walter McMillian are both black and innocent. Tom Robinson is accused of raping a white woman, Mayella Ewell who in fact

More about Argument Around Tom Robinson’s Case and Walter Mamillian’s Case

Open Document