Are Footballers Wages Justified?

1170 Words5 Pages
Cristiano Ronaldo hit the headlines again this summer by re-signing his contract with Real Madrid. This new contract gives him a pay increase to £250,000 per week. The question whether footballers are overpaid has caused many an argument between journalists, friends and family yet this area still remains grey. However, in my opinion, I feel their wages are fully justified and are in parallel with other top entertainers. One of the most influential factors in discussing this topic is by looking at the earnings of other top athletes. The Forbes Rich List of Sports Personalities was not topped by a footballer but a golfer, Tiger Woods. In fact, the first time a footballer was even mentioned on that list was at spot number 8 with Cristiano Ronaldo followed by Lionel Messi, at position 9. The next footballer to appear on the rankings was Wayne Rooney, at number 61. Who are footballers? In my opinion, they are entertainers. So I feel their earnings should be on the same level as others in this field. However, this is not the case. Take for example Leonardo Di Caprio, last year; he earned a whopping £65 million for just six hours of entertainment. Frank Lampard, on the other hand, earned £10 million for over 75 hours of enjoyment. In addition, the famous chat show host Jonathan Ross earned £2 million per year, through 2007-2010, for only working one day a week, and unlike footballers Mr Ross does not live his life by a set of rules. Is it fair to call footballers overpaid when people work half the amount of time, have no tough, physical training and earn the same amount of money and in some cases even more? Society feels that footballers’ lives are easy and trouble-free. In fact, it is quite the contrary. They train up to 9 hours every day, starting with a 6am warm up in the gym and then a day’s practice on the pitch. The players then have to give it their all,
Open Document