Are Blocked and Recovered Memories Valid Phenomena?

1294 Words6 Pages
Are Blocked and Recovered Memories Valid Phenomena? PSYCH/515 Kelly Gray-Smith Are Blocked and Recovered Memories Valid Phenomena? Introduction Some people in life have experienced an event so traumatic that the person will seek to avoid memories of the event as a way to cope with what has happened. People actively suppressing memories or avoiding the memories of the traumatic event is considered a normal coping process, however, there is controversy over a person being able to block the memory and recover the memory at a later date. Can a person really block memories of traumatic events and then recover the memories, or is this phenomena a case for false memory syndrome? This paper is going to process two differing views on the subject of block and recovered memories, one for and one against the use. The paper will cover the facts as well as opinions presented by both sides and the strengths, weaknesses, and how credible both sides were in the argument. Finally, the paper will select which side the author agrees with more as well as which side contemporary research supports. Facts and Opinions On the con side of the argument is John Kihlstrom who believes that the claims of blocked and recovered memories are nothing more than clinical folklore with no scientific study or evidence to provide proof. Kihlstrom continues that the emotional arousal resulting from a traumatic experience leads to the release of stress hormones that improve memory. Kihlstrom believes based on this a traumatic event should actually result in a more vivid memory as opposed to a repressed one. The pro side of the argument includes David Gleaves, Steven Smith, Lisa Butler, and David Spiegel assert that there are circumstances in which severe distress can lead a person to block a memory only to later recover the memory. Gleaves and his colleagues contend that while it has
Open Document