Anderson Theory Critique

1478 Words6 Pages
Anderson Theory Critique Gerald Romano Liberty University Concise Summary of Theory The Bondage Breaker, by Neil T. Anderson (2000) is a comprehensive book based on the theory that Satan and demonic forces are at play in our world and in people’s individual lives causing such things as negative thoughts, irrational feelings, and habitual sins. Anderson gives extensive examples of individuals he has worked with that were in bondage to Satan and demonic forces throughout the book. He discusses how Satan can take control of a person’s mind and cause that person to become severely depressed and a slave to sin. Anderson states that there are four qualifications for living in the authority and power of Christ. First is belief. In the spiritual realm, if you do not believe in God’s authority, you are not likely to exercise it in your life. The second qualification is humility. Individuals must be humble in their lives and not take credit for what is not theirs to take credit of. Christians are called upon to live humbly in Christ’s name and His authority. The third qualification for living in the authority and power of Christ is boldness. Anderson states that, “It is the mark of a Spirit-filled Christian to be strong and courageous” (Anderson, 2000, p. 86). He further goes on to say that this is the age of anxiety. Being anxious produces nothing. Boldness is life is critical. Lastly, dependence. As Christians, we have the authority to do God’s will. It is not the place of the Christian to charge out into life to conquer the enemy by one’s self. It is God’s place to do this with us and for us in life. He also discusses the three levels of Christian growth in relation to sin. The first level is compared to little children. They are in the family of God, but have not as of yet matured. The second level is young men. This level is characterized
Open Document