The conservative path they used could be defined by trying to win state by state in order to obtain women’s suffrage. Some strategies they used were having a parade in Washington, D.C., getting donations, and supporting Woodrow Wilson. On the other hand, NWP was much more radical than NAWSA. They used a radical path towards women’s suffrage and wanted a constitutional amendment. Some strategies they used were announcing themselves as an independent party and denouncing Woodrow Wilson during World War 1, going straight to Congress, starting their own newspaper and holding signs at the gate to the White House.
The church hierarchy would go bananas if any prominent Catholic Democrat – or any Democrat came in favor of abortion.” By 1940, Democrats seemed to be the party leaning towards Abortion because of the feminists piggybacked on the Civil Rights Amendment. McKenna, once again rebutting the idea and stating, “The Equal Rights Amendment was a republican cause.” The conflict
However as the war progressed and more issues became apparent, the divide between the rich and the poor and the left and the right wing became vaster. Before the war had commenced liberals and socialists were aggravated with German democracy. Germany portrayed itself as a democratic state, however all the power belonged to the elite. Kaiser Wilhelm II even boasted that he had never read the constitution. Therefore Liberals wanted constitutional reform and more power to be given to the Reichstag.
This included women’s suffrage, the direct election of senators, the availability of the referendum, and the right to recall representatives whose behavior in office did not satisfy their constituents. There were also progressives who hoped to increase efficiency in governments there by eliminating the power of elected officials by choosing to use “experts” in their place, thereby putting the progressives at odds with one another. . (www.u-s-history.com/pages/h106.html) Retrieved 11/2008 Throughout the Progressive Movement there were several accomplishments. For example, Teddy Roosevelt ended the 1902 coal mine strike, used the Sherman Antitrust Act to attack a railroad monopoly (known as the Northern Securities Case), and added Departments of Labor and Commerce to the cabinet.
Progressivism in the Wilson, Roosevelt, and Taft Administrations The order in which the presidents of the Progressive Era followed their ideals from greatest to least is Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921), Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909), and William Howard Taft (1909–1913). The goals of Progressivism were to strengthen the state, use government as an agent of human welfare, cure the ills of democracy with more democracy, and regain power of people usurped by “interests. Its political objectives were initiative, referendum, recall, secret ballot primary elections, direct election of senators, women’s suffrage, income tax, and prohibition. Wilson is first because he advocated votes for women and a graduated income tax for example and favored government action to prevent monopolies. Roosevelt is second because of his reputation as a “trustbuster” and for his legendary Square Deal.
One form of progressivism “focused on ways to use business practices to make government more efficient” (2006, p.328). These efficiency progressives believed that if a government worked properly, then problems in society would be solved. They also wanted a commission plan where a city’s government would be divided into departments under the control of a skillful commissioner. Another form of progressivism focused on the federal government’s regulation of big business. Progressives believed that wealth was too present in certain people’s hands; however, they disagreed over how to regulate big business.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor quickly ended the first debate, as the United States collectively wanted to fight back to the world at war around them, as well as help allies. However the republican party was split on the New Deal issue. The northern republicans, with a more liberal view, were not for the New Deal, but sought to revise it, unlike the western and Midwest republicans who hated it from the beginning. With Roosevelt's death allowing Truman to take office, as well as the end of the war cause labor unions and other entities to erupt in massive strikes, allowing the Republicans to gain control of the House for the first time since 1928 in
These factors include campaigning groups such as the Anti-Saloon league and the Women’s Christian Temperance Union, post-war tension, industries and religious groups. When the First World War broke out in 18914, 19 states had already passed prohibition legislation. The government during this period had passed into a stage of “progressivism”, they now believed that it was their responsibility to resolve social problems. This progressive feeling led them to control morality in the cities and to improve society. In their eyes introducing prohibition could decrease the levels of prostitution, gambling and crime in the cities .The war provided prohibitionists with more ammunition to support their cause.
During an age of mass industrialization and urbanization, obtaining social justice was of vital importance because with social justice established, social control would naturally be achieved due to the satisfaction of citizens being treated equally. Progressive reformers moved to correct flaws in government and improve societal equality, but they soon found the widened divisions in American society to be difficult, if not impossible, to overcome. (Out of Many, 606) Progressivism was characterized by a series of movements, each of them aimed in one way or another at renovating or restoring American society, its values, and institutions. (Out of Many, 612) The three basic social issues addressed by the Progressives were women suffrage, freedmens civil rights, and working conditions. Each group of reformers challenged the words of our founding fathers as stated in the Constitution, “…in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity,…promote the general welfare…to ourselves and our posterity…,” progressives were searching for a perfect union for every individual to be satisfied with.
Study sources 4,5 and 6. How far do you agree that Margaret Thatcher was a 'conviction' politician who was opposed to 'consensus' politics? Following the election of 1979, it seemed that merely winning the election was not enough for Margaret Thatcher, she seemed to be determined to stamp her stamp of authority on the British nation and for the first time after the second world war here it seemed there was a leader willing to smash the consensus politics that Britain was accustomed to see and that here was a leader to try and make Britain great again and do that she did, Thatcher was definitely a 'conviction' politician who was opposed to 'consensus' politics. It was a shock to many in the public and especially to Heath when Thatcher beat him in the Tory leadership election. Heath even told Thatcher that she would 'lose'.