3a. What is the shortest loan (36 months, 48 months, 60 months or 72 months) that has a monthly payment within your $500 budget that will allow you to buy the $45,000 car? Answer: Through Bank of America, I found a rate of 2.99% for the 36, 48 and 60 month loans. We are able to put down 20% and will need to finance $36,000. There is no loan period for the $45,000 car that would be under our $500
The common ratio is × × × = = = . Multiply each term by the common ratio to find the next three terms. The next three terms of the sequence are 8. −7, 21, −63, … , , and . eSolutions Manual - Powered by Cognero
1 ASQA's Shotgun Approach Brett Hilder, Argos Consulting A war is going on below the sightlines of the Australian taxpayers. As a combatant, I have been endeavouring to remove the fear related to dealing with the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) by unravelling its conduct and offering solutions to Registered Training Organisations (RTOs). It is only in this way that training organisations can be better armed. Now I am returning from the front to report, so that the taxpaying public can be better informed. Based on my company’s experience, ASQA appears to have seriously breached the NVR Act, 2011 on multiple occasions, and in so doing, discouraged quality training.
FOXTEL Introduction Foxtel is a company based in Australia in which it provides Australians with the chance to view payed TV which provides upto 200 channels. It gives Australians with better sound quality and image compared with that relevance to free tv. They mainly make there market through providing hundreds of international channels to Australian viewers. However all these advantages where only based on Foxtel untill Free TV channels like Channel Ten, Nine, Seven etc, started with provide more channels with same quality of image and sound that is provided by Foxtel. This factor has become a major challenge for Foxtel to lead in Australian Television.
She includes important statistics to persuade her Australian audience to believe that they do not live in a world of equality even though it is commonly thought to be otherwise. She uses statistical evidence based on the ‘pay gap’ between men and women in Australia, “The gender pay gap in Australia is 18 per cent”, “in WA the gap is the highest in the nation, with women earning just 76c for every dollar a man earns.” Money rules the lives of every individual, we live to make a living and in doing so, we forget how to live. Mayes is well aware of society’s obsession with money hence her inclusion of statistics that will cause a female to feel disadvantaged. She then adds that “women later in life…. are more likely than men to be living in poverty.” Considering that money is such an important aspect of everybody’s lives, some value it higher than life itself, the factual evidence therefore provokes a sense of anger from females, and perhaps even feminist males.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST GENDER CONSISTENCY THEORY AND GENDER SCHEMA THEORY Any cognitive developmental theory is based on the idea that children have to have reached a certain level of cognitive development before they can appreciate certain concepts, such as what it means to be a boy or girl, and the full implications of this. The gender consistency theory proposed by Kohlberg in 1966 and the gender schema theory proposed by Martin and Halverson in 1983 are the two major gender development theories considered by psychologists. Kohlberg’s theory was considered the dominant theory up until the 1970s and it was believed that biology heavily affected gender development. However there were many disputes over some elements of the theory, which lead to further theories such as the gender schema theory being developed. The major difference between the two is that the gender consistency theory proposes that children’s understanding of gender develops with age, whilst the gender schema theory suggests that early childhood gender development is influenced heavily by the ideas and concepts about what ‘maleness’ or ‘femaleness’ means in a particular society.
An enormous factor that plays into the number of viewers for The Super Bowl is the commercials; they are often very entertaining and usually funny. However, these endorsements are often very sexist and filled with logic fallacies. According to Merriam-Webster Online, sexism is “prejudice or discrimination based on sex” or “behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex.” These “sexual connotations” (Nilsen 36; 15) are shown throughout commercials year-round, but during the Super Bowl they are especially prevalent. Sexism is often shown through language. In the article “Sexism in English: Embodiment and Language,” Nilsen observes, “Going back to what I learned from my dictionary cards, I was surprised to realize how many pairs of words we have in which the feminine word has acquired sexual connotations while the masculine word
Q) does it have appellate jurisdiction? No, Because it’s the lowest court There are over 160 Local Courts in New South Wales. Local Court cases are heard by a magistrate without a jury. It hears summary offences (offences of a less serious nature) as well as indictable offences and committal hearings. It hears civil claims up to $100,000 and has a Small Claims Division for claims less than $10,000.
KU Med doesn’t utilize hiring bonuses, due to the fact that experienced individuals who are in high demand are paid much more upon being hired. This is because of the 5% increases in the yearly salaries offered for 2 years of experience. This essentially means that an individual with eight years of experience will start with a 20% increase in their first year starting salary over an individual with no experience. Have you ever thought of changing the pay systems? I haven’t considered changing the system all together.
This is outrageous in comparison to the average wage of an average male earning £30724 per year and the average female earning £23967 (statistics from thisislondon.com). The average persons wage is considered to be reasonably good and well earned as they would most probably have worked hard for the money. Whereas in comparison footballers only –to what we see- run about a grass field for 90 minutes to earn their salaries. If there is a large amount of hard work and labour put into being a footballer, it should be publicised more. I believe footballers deserve £33686, maximum, per year instead of per week.