Adm Financial Case

1021 Words5 Pages
1. Compare ADM’s cash flow from operating activities to its accrual basis net income. Is ADM’s 2008 net earnings well-supported by cash flows? Net Earnings are not supported by cash flow at all in 2008, considering that net earnings were over 1 billion, and operating cash flow was an outflow of over 3 billion. 2. If not, what three accruals contributed the most to the difference? The 3 accruals that contributed the most significantly are increase in inventory, increase in receivables, and increase in segregated cash and investments. 3. To assess the reasonableness of large changes in these three accruals, we need to gain some additional insight into changes in the commodity prices for corn and soybeans. o Go to http://www.fao.org/es/ESC/en/index.html…show more content…
o Click on 2008, hold down shift key, and click on 2004, submit query. o Download to excel file and retain values for June of each year (ADM’s month of fiscal year end) plus October 2008. o Compute the annual rate of inflation (June to June), and the rate of inflation from June 2008 to October 2008. o Comment on your findings. The average prices for both corn and soybeans increased from 2004 to 2008, and the change was fairly significant for both. It also seems that the prices are fairly volatile 4. Given what was going on in ADM’s product markets during 2008, does it seem reasonable that the accruals you identified in question (2), changed as much and in the direction they did? It does make sense that inventory increased by a significant amount because the price paid for the corn and soybeans increased significantly. 5. Compare net purchases of PPE to depreciation expense. Is ADM growing or shrinking its investment base in PPE? It is growing its base in PPE, as it continues to buy more PPE then the depreciation expense by a significant amount. 6. Estimate ADM’s free cash flow by taking CFO – CFI. Was their free cash flow positive or…show more content…
How does the change in accounts payable plus the change in accrued liabilities per the balance sheet compare to the amount reported on the cash flow statement? Shouldn’t these be the same? The change in accounts payable+change in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet is greater than the change on the cash flow statement. It does seem that they should be the same in a more simple case. However, this case is far from simple as shown by the answer to requirement 9. In this case the difference is due to non-cash unrealized losses on forward cash purchases, which are included in accounts payable. 11. Changes in accruals greater than 5% of NOA are generally considered “large” and worthy of further consideration. Examine the table above. Which of ADM’s accruals are “large” relative to the benchmark? Do all of these large changes in accruals seem reasonable given what you know was happening in ADM’s product markets during 2008? The following are the large accruals: receivables, inventories, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The large increase in inventories, accounts receivable, and accounts payable seems the most appropriate, considering the prices of soybeans and corn both have significantly increased over the last few years, and also seem to have gone back and forth quite a bit. Accrued liabilities is the most difficult to explain based on ADM’s product markets, but it does make sense that it would follow the trend set by the change in the prices of
Open Document