Access the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households.

897 Words4 Pages
Access the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. According to functionalist sociologists, the family is a key institution of society. It performs vital functions for the maintenance of society as a whole and for the benefit of all its individual members. Murdock argues that the family performs four essential functions to meet the needs of society and its members, these included: stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same partner which prevents the social disruption caused by sexual free-for-all. Another function is the reproduction of the next generation without which the society could not continue. It also included the socialisation of the young into societies shared norms and values and meeting its members’ economic needs, such as food and shelter. However, other sociologists have criticised Murdock’s functionalist approach. Marxists and feminists reject his ‘rose tinted’ harmonious consensus view that the family meets the needs of both the wider society and all members of the family. They argue that functionalism neglects conflict and exploitation. Parsons’ argues that the particular structure and functions of a given type of family will ‘fit’ the needs of society in which it is found in. he argues that the family fits the needs of industrial society and is the dominant family type in that society, while the extended family fits the needs of pre-industrial society. Parsons’ sees industrial society as having two essential needs: A geographically mobile workforce and a socially mobile workforce. While functionalist sociologists see society as based on value consensus, Marxist sociologists see capitalist society as based on an unequal conflict between two social classes: the capitalist class who owns the means of production and the working class, whose labour the capitalists exploit for profits. Marxists see
Open Document