Absolute And Relative Poverty

830 Words4 Pages
The aim of this essay is to identify the clear definition of Absolute and Relative poverty within Britain. Since the outbreak of the 19th Century researchers have rigorously tried to establish a fixed mechanism on which to measure poverty against. There have been many areas of controversy during this time, a main factor of dispute has been whether deprivation should be measured in absolute or relative terms. “Absolute poverty is based on the extent of ability of a person, to provide biological material needs for food, water or clothing”. (class notes 2011). It can be subdivided into two categories: Primary poverty and Secondary poverty. Primary poverty is when families spend all of their money (income) on basic essentials but will still go without some necessities. On the other hand those that are in secondary poverty spend all of their money on non-essential items, but then have to go without necessary items. Seebohm Rowntree carried out a research on ’Poverty’ in York in 1899. He conducted the research to discover how many people in York were actually living in absolute poverty. He made up questionnaires which he only gave to working class people. He discovered that only 33% of people were living in absolute poverty. Rowntree aimed his research at discovering the real extent of poverty and what distinguished the poor from the non-poor. It was also the closest to the “budget standard approach” (class notes 2011). This approach is also being used today by governments. Rowntree based his definition on what he decided which resources would be necessary for a person to be able to be healthy and to work efficiently. Rowntree became influenced by Charles Booth, they both discovered that ‘poor people were hard working families, that had fallen into poverty that was beyond their control’ (class notes 2011). Peter Townsend carried out his research in 1979. Townsend
Open Document