Abortion is a good example of that. If a woman does not believe in a higher power, what justifies her right to an abortion? With the theory of ethical relativism, it is up to the mother whether she believes that the abortion is morally right or wrong, not society’s morals. Some might ask how a woman could possibly feel that an abortion is a just decision. In cases where the woman is unable to care for the child either; financially, emotionally, or mentally, she may feel that the abortion is morally acceptable.
Warren beings her argument by acknowledging that abortion “…usually entails the death of a fetus. ( Social and Personal Ethics: The Moral Status Of Abortion, Marry Anne Warren, Page 109)” Shockingly enough, at least to many individuals, Warren still holds firm that safe abortion is both morally permissible and under no circumstance should be illegal. Warren recognizes that it is almost futile to argue with those who believe that abortion is equivalent to murder unless it is argued that fetuses to not have the same right to life as other human beings. She does this by
So if one has an abortion it is considered murder. On the other hand, pro abortionist believe that fetus is not dependant on the mother until it is born. The fetus is connected by the placenta, and is only separated at birth, so it is not murder. The flaw in these arguments are, when do we call a fetus a person? From a religious standpoint they believe that when the fetus arrives it is a person.
They would therefore promote the idea that as a foetus is a person from conception, it therefore has a right to live just like every person and this right is more important than the mother’s right to decide what happens to her body. Despite this, Roman Catholics do generally accept the doctrine of double effect in the event of an ectopic pregnancy where the foetus is in the fallopian tube as the intention is to save the mother’s life which is a good effect with the second bad effect being that the foetus dies. Therefore, Roman Catholics would teach that ending a human being’s life through abortion is intrinsically wrong except under the doctrine of double effect. On the other hand, someone who believed in the quality of life, such as an Act Utilitarian as opposed to the sanctity of life, which emphasises the nature of life or the conditions in which it is lived for both the mother and the foetus. For example, if it is known that the foetus will be born into a miserable life in which it is unloved or cannot be cared for, an Act Utilitarian would see this as sufficient grounds for an abortion but the opposite would mean that the abortion would be less justified.
Women Right to Choose Who’s right is it to choose whether or not a child is aborted? It is the woman’s body, but the child is both the man and woman’s offspring. The issue of woman’s right is one thing that should be considered. In the event that the mother was raped, if she is (for example) a 10 yr. old child or if by having the baby it would put the mother’s life in danger, then there is something that needs to be done. Forcing a woman to carry the child of a rapist simply because one believes that abortion is wrong would be infringing in on the rights of the mother.
The movement of anti-abortion was created and was also expanding. Creating two sides: pro-life which are against abortion, stating that abortion is murder. They believe that the fetus is a person, and has rights like all humans, and shouldn’t be killed. And the other side is pro-choice, entailing that those against abortion are against choice. They don’t see the fetus as an individual, they think that it’s mother’s decision to stay pregnant or not.
Should abortion be legalized in all states and individuals be allowed to make such decisions for themselves? Should abortion be legalized in all states? Arguably this is possibly the most balanced and most frequently debated question. The first subject of debate is when personhood should technically be recognized. Persons that are pro legal abortion claim that a fetus is not a human being and that personhood begins at birth.
Abortion affects an emotionally like the guilt, the anger, the depression, may haunt a woman after an abortion. Only a woman who has been through them really understands how an abortion can wreak emotional feelings. The following emotional side effects may be experienced either immediately or several years after an abortion. Women may develop eating disorders, or may suffer from alcohol and drug abuse as a response to the depression that occurs after an abortion. In some cases women may have repeated flashbacks of the entire procedure of abortion, which excessively increases the guilt, to the point where women may begin to contemplate
It can cause the baby to have fetal brain damage, premature birth, and even death. The women can also encounter becomes older it can get ADD, respiratory disorders, and behavioral problems. When a woman harm to herself like high blood pressure, obesity, delivery and other birth problems. As the baby smokes the chemicals into her blood stream it passes directly to
The first one is known as therapeutic abortion, in this type it is performed when there is life threatening or significant risk to the patient health. The second type is known as elective abortion. This is carried out as personal matter of choice, or simply its women choice to terminate their pregnancy without health problem as the cause. The last one is an abortion in which the fetus is expelled from woman’s body as a result of accident, injury or natural causes (What abortion?, n.d.). Focusing in Thailand this subject has been a major cause to generate controversy as women argue for their productive right, this subject has all so passing the Fourth World Conference on Women, in which the Asian have moved in to the forefront.