A Critical Comparison Of Counselling Approaches

2944 Words12 Pages
“The primary role of the counsellor is not that of merely using certain techniques, even with warmth and sympathy. Counselling is essentially an ethical task: it is to serve the client’s best interests” (Munro et al, 1989:4). As stated in the abovementioned quote, the principal role of counselling is to serve the client’s best interests. In order to achieve this in therapy, however, various approaches to counselling need to be considered, chosen, and carefully implemented to aid the client in the most beneficial way possible. As each approach differs, so do the views pertaining to the relationship between the counsellor and client. This differentiation is of essential importance as this relationship proves to be of fundamental consequence in therapy and in serving the client’s needs suitably. With reference to the different views of the aforesaid relationship, this essay will explore three approaches to counselling known as the psychodynamic, person-centred and cognitive-behavioural approaches to counselling. This exploration will attempt to compare and contrast each approach whilst exploring the possibility of which one may prove to be most beneficial and effective. Additionally, these will be critically compared and contrasted with reference to how each approach views and differs with respect to the nature of the counselling relationship, what the ideal nature of the relationship is, how the relationship can benefit or hinder therapy, and if and how it is used to assist therapy. Furthermore, a critical perspective will be offered which will suggest how I would evaluate these different views and which one I would agree with and how. Firstly, before each approach can be critically compared and contrasted respectively, there needs to be a comprehensive understanding and explanation of each one, as well as their particular views regarding the relationship between
Open Document