Which side of the debate is more influential? The answer is still to be found. One of the important studies that had been carried out whether certain personality traits were results of their genes or of their environment; Sources of Human Psychological Differences, the Minnesota Study of separated Twins at birth. This famous study of identical twins born of the same egg, fertilised of the same sperm – Thomas Bouchard of the University of Minnesota. Studying identical twins who were
Traits like hair or eye color are known to be genetically linked, but behaviors, preferences and abilities are researched to see whether genetics or environment play a bigger role. One research method that is particularly useful in the nature/nurture debate is the twin study. Multiple twin research studies exist worldwide to look at these questions. Twin studies are a beneficial tool to use in this type of research because monozygotic (identical) twins share 100% the same genes, and fraternal, or dizygotic twins share half their genes, therefore they can be used to help determine if traits are hereditary or not. Identical twins who are raised together have more similar traits than
M1 – the nature – nurture debate Philosophers and theorist have argued that it is the way we are born to be the way we are. Whereas other theorists have argued that it is the way we are brought up and influenced by our surroundings that makes us the way we are. The way we look can be argued to be mainly due to nature, the genes we inherit from our parents makes us look the way we do. For example, when people say “don’t you look like your mother/father” Genetic inheritance can determine our eye colour, whether we have curly or straight hair or how tall we will be. We also can inherit certain disease which can have an impact on our health.
Our Nature part, our behaviors, our inborn instincts, which we believe must be genetic, is “what we’re all about”. The Nurture part, begs the question of how our surroundings has shaped us over time. Some scientists fall into the camp of “nature is what makes us what we are”. We are genetically related to our biological parents and siblings, therefore, we should be mini-mes of our family; we should all act and think the same way – or close to it. Some scientists fall into the other camp that it’s the “nurturing that makes us who we are”.
Case workers, child welfare services, and the psychological community alike have taken an interest as to the impact sibling separation has on an individual child. Sibling relationships are the most enduring of interpersonal ties and serve as important contexts for individual development (East & Khoo, 2005). The researchers wanted only to observe the effect that sibling relationships have on adjustment during tenure in foster care and other factors. A broad sample pool was used and factors such as age spacing, initial placement, duration of maltreatment, kinship vs. certified foster home, caregiver language, and disability were used as elimination (control) factors. This particular study used 78 sibling pairs (after elimination).
Running head: NATURE VS NURTURE: TWO STUDIES Nature vs Nurture: Two Studies Lesli A. Hill Western Governors University Nature vs Nurture: Two Studies Almost since the beginning of time, humans have tried to figure out why we are the way we are. Are our traits the result of our genetics, or our living situation? This question is the crux of the raging debate called “nature versus nurture.” The nature vs. nurture debate is all about determining whether we are shaped more by heredity or environment, and it has been applied to everything from intelligence to disease processes to sexual orientation. Proponents of the nature theory believe that we are destined have certain qualities because they are pre-programmed into our DNA, while supporters of the nurture theory believe that we learn our
Nature Vs Nurture Essay The debate between nature versus nurture has been argued for centuries. Some scientists think that people behave as they do according to genetic tendency or even animal instincts. This is the nature theory of human behavior. The Nature Theory believes that traits such as intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation are encoded in DNA, much like eye and hair color. While other scientists believe that, people think and behave in certain ways because they are taught to do so.
Before I took this class I thought that a person’s development was based mostly on their nature. Nurture is how someone is raised. Nature is what is in someone’s genetics. For example, someone can be intelligent due to genetics which they received from their parents. An example, for nurture would be children would hit other children because that is what their parents did to them.
Nature vs. Nurture Your eye color, straight or curly hair, height and pigment of skin are all inherited and a part of our genes. However is the way we act? The question of “are we born bad or made bad” has caused quite a controversy for years. Researchers have been studying if it is nature or nurture that makes us who we are. In other words, are we born to be a certain way or are we shaped by external influences such as parents, friends, and social expectations.
One of the most intriguing and central debates in science today is the question on whether nature or nurture defines us as humans. Are we a product of our genes or our experiences? Fortunately for scientists today, there have been many cases available to provide evidence of either nurture or nature as the factor responsible for specific behaviours, emotions and morals. By analyzing and comparing these cases, a conclusion can be determined in order to induce to what extent nature influences the lives of these specimens. Among the cases studied in class, those that were most prominent, when it came to studying nature, were the twin studies.