How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible For The Fall Of The Romanovs In 1917 Essays

  • Tsar Nicholas II Essay

    1088 Words  | 5 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II (Nikolai Aleksandrovich Romanov) ruled Russia, the largest country in the world. The population of Russia ranged from the lower class to the upper class. Starting with the poor, peasants and to the wealthy nobles. His family, the Romanov was one of the wealthiest of its era. Tsar Nicholas II was also titled Emperor of Russia, King of Poland and Grand Duke of Finland. Nicholas was born on May 19th 1868 at Tsarskoe Selo and had an unusual childhood compared to the rest of his family

  • Decline And Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty Essay

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    towards the Tsar but a minor contribution to the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty. The Romanov Dynasty was destroyed as a result of various disastrous incidents and major mistakes made by the Tsar Nicholas the || himself. The First World War played a role in his abdication, but to a minor extent as they agitated the citizens to rise against the Tsar. Indeed the first world war had fundamental impacts upon the decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty some of these being the plummeting economy, lack

  • Death Of Tsar Nicholas Ii Essay

    546 Words  | 3 Pages

    The increasing pressures of World War 1 combined with years of injustice, lead to the fall of Russian Romanov Tsar Nicholas 2 in March 1917. Forced to step down from power, Nicholas was replaced by a Provisional government committed to continuing the war. However there was increasing losses and fear of German advance on Moscow showed what little support remained for the war and, undermined the provisional government’s authority. Hoping to aggravate the uproar, the Germans were said to have secretly

  • Tzar Nicholas Ii Essay

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nicholas, the eldest son of Alexander III , the Tsar of Russia , and Marie Feodorovna, was born at Krasnoye Selo in May 1868. When he was twenty-three he narrowly escaped assassination in Japan. Nicholas succeeded to the throne following his father's death from liver disease on 20th October, 1894. Later that month he married the German princess, Alexandra of Hesse-Darmstadt . Alexandra, the grand-daughter of Queen Victoria , was a strong believer in the autocratic power of Tsardom and urged him

  • Nicholas Ii Russia Essay

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    How effectively did Nicholas II deal with the problems facing Russia in the period 1894-1905 The Russo-Japanese war (1904-1905) revealed the weakness of Russia and how it being such a big country was a problem. The first mistake Nicholas made was underestimating the Japanese, they did have a strong army and their army was more modernised so the army and navy were far better prepared and equipped but their main advantage was that they were closer to Manchuria than Russia so reinforcements were

  • Romanov Essay

    2066 Words  | 9 Pages

    Romanov essay Romanov family had ruled Russia since 1613 and under a autocratic government, during the time between 1904-1918 Nicholas the 2nd had ruled taking all the responsibilities of the major collapse of the tsarist regime. There were many contributing factors that lead to the eventual collapse of the Romanov regime. The major events that affected Romanov rule included the many social, economic and political problems. Particular events which also acted as a catalyst for the collapse of the

  • Romanovs Essay

    1773 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Fall of the Romanov Dynasty The Romanov family ruled the Russian empire for over 300 years until Tsar Alexander 3rd died in 1894 and was succeeded by his eldest son, Nicholas 2nd. Nicholas’ reign brought an end to autocratic rule in Russia due to a vast number of various disastrous incidents and major mistakes. Nicholas himself was totally unprepared to rule a country as his father had died much younger than he had predicted, before teaching his son how to rule. Nicholas’ choice of wife, Alexandra

  • Romanov Essay

    1039 Words  | 5 Pages

    Preliminary Modern History Task: Decline and fall of the Romanovs Alex Lai Due: Wednesday 28 March 2012 Under the repressive and conservative rule of Nicholas II from 1894 to 1917, the Russian autocracy experienced a failure in satisfying the demands of its populace. Through the reversal of earlier policy and further imposition of repressive policy, this inability to govern fuelled the mentality of revolutionists and secured the fall of Tsardom. Nicholas’ conservative upbringing concerning the

  • Abdication of Tsar Nicholas Ii Essay

    1889 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Romanov Dynasty was comprised of one of the most powerful families in history, enduring a reign over half the length of the British Empire and over three times age of Australia as a country. The Romanov Dynasty managed to maintain control whilst expanding Russia's power. This feat was comparable to the British Empire with influence and in land mass was only succeeded by the Mongolian Empire. This success receded in just one generation due to a mixture of short and long term factors such as Russia's

  • Romanov Essay

    1036 Words  | 5 Pages

    Advanced History Essay March the 2nd 1917, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia has decided to abdicate the throne, thus bringing to an end the Romanov Dynasty that had ruled over the Empire for 300 years. By the time of his abdication, it was clear that the Tsar had few supporters to whom he could turn to at this crucial time. His dictatorial rule and mishandling of the war had led to widespread discontent among the people. Long-term factors such as the issue of land reform, the oppressive nature of the

  • How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks' Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917-24? Essay

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plan: * He was a natural-born leader; intelligent, charismatic etc * He gave his speech of "peace, land and bread" * he released the April Theses * he was utterly meticulous; left nothing to chance  * he made effective use of propaganda and influence to control his followers  Opposition to argument : * Problem with people liking one party rule Problems:   * press – banned October ‘17 * political parties – outlawed Kadets, arrested political leaders

  • Tsar Nicholas Ii Essay

    666 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sources on Tsar Nicholas II: Was he a good ruler for Russia? Skill: Interpretations |Source 1: “The daily work of a monarch he found intolerably boring. He could|Source 2: “His ancestors did not pass on to him one quality which would have | |not stand listening long or seriously to ministers’ reports, or reading |made him capable of governing an empire.” Written by Trotsky, one of the | |them.” Written by Kerensky, the leader of the government which took over |leaders of the revolutionaries

  • How Far Was the First World War the Main Cause of the Fall of the Romanov’s in February 1917?’ (30 Marks) Essay

    1006 Words  | 5 Pages

    How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of the Romanov’s in February 1917?’ (30 marks) The Romanov’s were the ruling family of Russia from 1613 to 1917. This, however, all ended when Tsar Nicholas II abdicated the throne as the result of what would become known as the February Revolution, although there were many factors that affected Nicholas’ decision. To a certain extent, you could blame the First World War for the downfall of the Romanov’s. However, it could also be argued

  • On Nicholas Ii Essay

    1058 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nicholas II was the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty, and his own arrogance and incompetence was a key factor in what led him to that title. His decision to maintain an autocratic government, fight in the Russo-Japanese war, and, ultimately, drag Russia into World War I, proved he was not fit to rule, and his actions led to the destruction of his dynasty. In these ways, Nicholas II, while faced with many problems, may have survived had he not ruled the way he did. Nicholas II was an implacable

  • How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks' Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917-1924? Essay

    1312 Words  | 6 Pages

    How far was Lenin responsible for the Bolsheviks’ growing hold on power in the years 1917-1924? To a fairly large extent, Lenin was responsible for the Bolsheviks’ growing hold on power from 1917-24. Lenin had, of course, led the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution, the reason the Bolsheviks had any power in the first place, and it was Lenin who dissolved the Constituent Assembly. He also managed to hold on to power by introducing War Communism during the Civil War. On the other hand, it can be

  • How Important Was the Bolshevik Threat to Tsardom in the Reign of Nicholas Ii? Essay

    1609 Words  | 7 Pages

    Gareth Parker How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II? The threat to Tsardom is complex and needs to be understood from different viewpoints. Initial examination of the Bolsheviks is vital from formation to the growing strength of revolutionaries such as Lenin and Trotsky and their influence on the downfall of Tsarism. Nicholas II was key to his own demise, not only his poor leadership but also his alienation from his own people and the average Russians way

  • How Far Was the First World War the Main Cause of the Fall of the Romanovs in 1917 Essay

    1075 Words  | 5 Pages

    How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of the Romanovs in 1917? In March 1917, the Tsar Nicholas II made his decision to abdicate the throne thus, causing the fall of the monarchy in Russia. The First World War was most certainly a factor that caused the fall of the Romanovs however; there are many other factors that must be considered. At the beginning of the war, there was a strong sense of patriotisms in Russia due to excellent war performance. The decline in Russia’s war

  • How Far Was the First World War the Main Cause of the Fall of the Romanovs in Feb 1917? Essay

    1629 Words  | 7 Pages

    How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Mikhail Romanov founded the Romanov dynasty in 1613, when he was unanimously elected Tsar of Russia by a national assembly. However, in 1917, the rule of the Romanovs came to an abrupt end, as Tsar Nicholas II abdicated. His train, on its way to Petrograd so that he could attempt to take control over the strikes and demonstrations that had gripped the city, was stopped by anti-government soldiers, who had gained

  • Romanov Essay

    2241 Words  | 9 Pages

    Dinastía Romanov . Dinastía Romanov | | País | Rusia | Títulos | Emperador y Autócrata de todas las Rusias | Fundador | Patriarca Filareto | Último gobernante | Nicolás II | Fundación | 1596 | Destitución | Revolución rusa de 1917 | La Dinastía Romanov, fue una dinastía rusa establecida en Moscú desde el siglo XVII, que accedió al trono en 1613 con la entronización de Miguel I, hijo del patriarca Filareto (primo de Fiódor I de Rusia) y rigió el país hasta que la Revolución de Febrero

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Fall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    How far was Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917? While Nicholas II was a major factor in the fall of the Romanovs there were other reasons such as the removal of the Dumas and him losing the support of the armed forces. Nicholas II became commander in chief of the army during world war one and in doing so left his wife Alexandra to rule the country. The fact that he had let someone so inexperienced take control angered many people due to the Tsar not leaving someone more

  • Fall of the Romanov Dynasty Essay

    1661 Words  | 7 Pages

    To what extent was Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was greatly impacted by the influence of the Tsar Nicholas. His abortive role as a leader and his failure to provide for the people of his country were the just some of the factors that lead to the collapse of the 300 year old dynasty. The fall however was not an occurrence that happened instantaneously but instead a gradual collapse that had many contributing factors such as the influence

  • To What Degree Was the Revolution of February 1917 the Direct Result of the Incompetence of Nicholas Ii? Essay

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    ------------------------------------------------- Essay Question:'To what degree was the Revolution of February 1917 the direct result of the incompetence of Nicholas II?' A revolution is defined by Gemie (2006) as a movement to end corruption and abuse; to ‘right wrongs’. It is an overthrow of a government or social order for a new and better system. The desire for better societal order sparked the events of the February 1917 Russian Revolution, which was debatably caused by a combination of internal and external

  • To What Extent Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Collapse of the Tsarist System? Essay

    1756 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Russian Revolution 1917 To what extent was Nicholas II responsible for the collapse of the tsarist system? In November 1917 (October O.S.), during the final phase of World War I the Russian October Revolution took place which led to the removal of Russia from the war and brought the transformation of the Russian Empire to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Russia’s traditional monarchy was replaced with the world’s first Communist state. The term Russian Revolution includes not

  • Why Was Nicholas Ii Still Tsar in 1914? Essay

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why was Nicholas II still Tsar in 1914? Nicholas II was still Tsar in 1914 because autocracy and Tsarism were both strong and controlling, whereas the opposition were very weak. Hereditary ideas about autocracy from the Romanov family, economic development from the Tsar and the creation of the Duma, all meant he was still in power in 1914. A long term cause of Nicholas II still being in power in 1914 was the hereditary ideas passed down by the Romanov family to Nicholas II when he was next

  • Why Did Nicholas Ii Loose Power in 1917 but Not 1905 Essay

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why did Nicholas II loose power in 1917 but not 1905 Nicholas II lost power in 1917 because of many reasons. The main reason was the army which was under complete control of the tsar started to rebel against the Tsar by not carrying out his orders. On the 25th of February Cossack troops refused to fire on demonstrators. Also the elite Pavlosky life guards also refused to carry out their orders. This was the first sing to the Tsar to show that he has lost his authority and that the government authority

  • How Far Was Wwi Essentially Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1817 Essay

    407 Words  | 2 Pages

    How far was WWI essentially responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs in 1817? For years tension had been brewing due to many different aspects of life in Russia, like the personality of the Tsar, the inconsistency of the Duma and general weaknesses which prevented Russia in becoming a successfully developed and industrialised country. However other factors such as abandonment of the Tsars traditional supporters and the First World War would be considered very influential in building upon the

  • Nicholas Romanov Essay

    2703 Words  | 11 Pages

    Essay “Tsar Nicholas II was the reason for the Romanov Dynasty downfall. Justify” The Romanov Dynasty controlled the Russian Empire one of the most powerful European states for over three centuries, however it did not come, as a surprise to the Russians when the Romanov dynasty finally collapsed in 1917. The downfall of the Dynasty was not caused by one factor but a combination of unfortunate circumstances, wrong decisions and an unsuitable leader Tsar Nicholas II. When Nicholas II became Tsar

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Resposible for the Downfall on the Romanovs in 1917 Essay

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    How far was Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917? In 1917, Russia were currently in their third year fighting in World War 1 and had just gone through a major revolution, the February Revolution, which caused a lot of negative feelings towards the government. In 1917, Nicholas II was forced to abdicate on behalf of himself and his son after being captured by members of the state Duma. There were many reasons why the Romanovs fell from power in 1917, one being the war failures

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for His Own Downfall in February 1917? Essay

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Romanov dynasty dated back to the early 1600s. It cannot be denied that Tsar Nicholas II’s military failures and poor political decisions were one of the largest parts in the downfall of autocracy as a political system. From the beginning, it was clear that Nicholas was not well suited as Tsar of Russia. For autocracy to function, it needed clear direction from the autocrat. The disposition that Nicholas brought to the role of Tsar (he was incredibly close to his family) led to huge flaws

  • Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty Essay

    2354 Words  | 10 Pages

    NICHOLAS II Nicholas was the last Russian tsar, who ruled from 1894 until 1917. Nicholas II, who assumed the throne with trepidation upon his father Alexander III’s death, was a clumsy and ineffective leader whose avoidance of direct involvement in government caused resentment among the Russian people and resulted in violence in 1905. Nicholas II abdicated on March 2, 1917, as a result of the February Revolution. In July 1918, the Bolsheviks executed Nicholas along with his wife, Alexandra, and

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs Essay

    1889 Words  | 8 Pages

    How far was Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917? The fall of the Romanov dynasty in 1917 was the culmination of many factors. It is perhaps widely noted that Nicholas II was not suited to his role as Tsar, mainly due to his character and personality. Resentment of his wife and her involvement with the mystical Rasputin was also widespread and helped contribute to the collapse of the monarchy. Also the state of the country during World War One left a lot to be desired

  • How Far Was Henry Vi Responsible for 1455. Essay

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    How far was the outbreak of civil war in 1455 a direct result of Henry’s inadequacies as king? In order to assess the cause of civil war, we must understand it’s meaning. Civil war is defined as a war between factions or regions of the same country. In this particular by w05anettletoncase, it was a battle between the ‘Yorkists’, who were Loyal to Richard Duke of York, and the ‘Lancastrians’, who were Loyal to the King. There were many factors that aided the outbreak in 1455, however I believe

  • How Far Do You Agree That the First World War Was Responsible for the February Revolution 1917? Essay

    680 Words  | 3 Pages

    without a doubt that the great war was a major factor for the outbreak of the February revolution in 1917, however many other factors have to be taken into consideration when dealing with a complex issue such as this. Issues such as the decisions made by Tsar Nicholas II whilst in power, the lack of political reform since the October manifesto was issued in 1905, the socio-economic position of the proletariat which was ever worsening and the fact that this revolution was much more organized than the 1905

  • Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Failure of Tsarism Essay

    2598 Words  | 11 Pages

    Kerry Spencer How far was Nicholas II responsible for tsardom’s collapse? The fall of tsarism in Russia in 1917 was the culmination of many factors. It is perhaps widely noted that Nicholas II was not suited to his role as Tsar, mainly due to his character and personality. Resentment of his wife and her involvement with the mystical Rasputin was also widespread and helped contribute to the collapse of the monarchy. Also the state of the country during World War One left a lot to be desired and

  • How Far Was the First World War Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    1608 Words  | 7 Pages

    How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Mikhail Romanov founded the Romanov dynasty in 1613, when a national assembly unanimously elected him Tsar of Russia. However, in 1917, the rule of the Romanovs came to an abrupt end, as Tsar Nicholas II abdicated. Anti-government soldiers, who had gained control of the line, so that he could attempt to take control over the strikes and demonstrations that had gripped the city, stopped his train, on its way to

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    878 Words  | 4 Pages

    contributed to the downfall of the Romanovs – and Tsar Nicholas II was not responsible for all of them. Some of the issues that caused the collapse of the Romanovs’ reign had begun even before he had come into power. However, the many mistakes he made during his reign undoubtedly sealed their fate. Problems with Russia’s monarchy had begun long before Nicholas II came to the throne. For example, a large contributor towards the Romanovs’ steady deterioration was the dissatisfaction of the people

  • How Far Was the First World War Essentially Responsible for the Fall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    1308 Words  | 6 Pages

    World War was largely responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917. This is because of food shortages, reliance on financial aid from Britain and France, the military, and the rise of independent groups. However it can be argued factors such as food shortages, and lack of work would have been caused by the rapid population growth within Russia at the time. Despite this, this essay contends the First World War to a large extent was essentially responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917. Firstly

  • How Far Was Kennedy Responsible for Vietnam Essay

    938 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kennedy. Was Johnson's Vietnam policy simply a continuation of Kennedy's? Was Vietnam policy designed solely by the United States Presidents? What were the similarities and differences of the two administrations? In order to answer these questions, I'm not going to refer to detailed facts in this essay. I will examine the Vietnam policies of the two Presidents separately and then I will compare and contrast the two policies together, in order to make clear if Johnson's Vietnam policy was simply a

  • What Was the Reason for the Fall of Tsar Nicholas in 1917? Essay

    1979 Words  | 8 Pages

    The fall of the Tsar in Russia in 1917 was the culmination of many factors. It was clear since the beginning of his reign that Nicholas II was not suited to his role as Tsar, mainly due to his character and personality. Although Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto to pacify the discontent of people temporarily, he still had to face some problems after the 1905 Revolution. To regain the support from people, he needed to carry out the reforms in the October Manifesto. His reform included different

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Fall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    The fall of the Romanovs in 1917 was caused by many factors for instance, the soldiers, workers, LiberaAYASHA IMRAN ls and the Duma, socialist groups, government ministers and army generals and the Tsar himself. The Tsar himself did carry out an important role in the fall of Romanov in 1917, due to his attitude to his people and how evil and stubborn he was. Furthermore tsars tactics used were a wrong choice; however there are other factors that caused the fall of the Romanov in 1917, which I am

  • How Far Was Lenin Responsible for the Bolsheviks Growing Hold on Power in the Years 1917-24? Essay

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lenin was responsible for the Bolsheviks growing hold on power in the years 1917-24. He was responsible for changing strategy with the April thesis and the overthrow of the provisional government. This gained him popularity and support from the Russian populous. To strengthen power he dissolved the constituent assembly in 1918. His harsh policy of war communism and the use of the checka in the years of the civil war, removed opposition to his power. Following the Civil War his introduction to the

  • How Far Is It Accurate to Say That Nicholas the Second Was Personally Responsible for the 1917 Revolution Essay

    483 Words  | 2 Pages

    How far is it accurate to say that Nicholas 2nd was personally responsible for his own downfall in February 1917? It can be argued that as a leader, Tsar Nicholas the 2nd was responsible for his own downfall due to his involvement in worldwide affairs like ww1 and his own personal mistakes throughout his reign over Russia. Things such as his family orientated approach to ruling effecting his stature as the “little father” or his failure to combat the German problem. However it can also be suggested

  • How Far Was Is It the First World War That Was Essentially Responsible for the Downfall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    1295 Words  | 6 Pages

    In 1917 after 300 years of ruling Russia, the Romanov dynasty was toppled by the appetite for change. I believe that the First World War was responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs. The main difference between the 1905 ‘revolution’ and the 1917 revolutions was that the army sided with the revolutionaries in 1917. This being the key reason as to why Autocracy fell. When Russia entered World War 1 in 1914 to when they left in 1917, they suffered numerous military defeats. They originally

  • How Far Do You Agree That the First World War Was Mainly Responsible for the February Revolution of 1917? Essay

    905 Words  | 4 Pages

    How far do you agree that the first world war was mainly responsible for the February revolution of 1917? To fully understand to what extent the first world was was responsible for the February revolution of 1917 we must look further than the war itself. Other factors such as the actions of the Tsar Nicholas alongside the social and economic strains the was placed upon the country can also be identified as important. The war played a large part in influencing the revolution. When war was

  • How Important Was the Bolshevik Threat to Tsardom in the Reign of Nicholas Ii 1894 – 1917? Essay

    1355 Words  | 6 Pages

    up to the reign of Nicholas II that influenced the political climate present during his reign. The outcome of the Crimean war of 1856 in which Russia fought the western powers of France and Great Britain was a key event as it was the catalyst for social reform in Russia. Defeat in the war emphasised the backwards nature of Russia and its lack of social, industrial and political progress when compared with that of Western Europe. Among the reforms introduced by Alexander II was the emancipation of

  • How Important Was the Bolsheviks Threat to Tsardom in the Reign of Nicholas Ii? Essay

    1079 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Bolshevik threat to Tsardom during the reign of Nicholas II wasn't as important as other threats from other political parties, the war and as Nicholas was to himself. The beginning of World War I signalled the beginning of the end of the Romanov dynasty. On August 2 1914 Tsar Nicholas II issued a formal proclamation of hostilities towards Germany at the Winter Palace to a crowd of thousands of cheering Russians in Palace Square. The Tsar abdicated the Russian throne three years later and the

  • How Far Was Nicholas Ii Responsible for the Fall of the Romanovs in 1917? Essay

    1208 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nicholas II was the Tsar of Russia and he abdicated in 1917 after the revolution, ending the Romanov dynasty. Nicholas II was seen as being responsible for the fall of Romanovs but there were many other factors which played a part in their fall. World War 1 was responsible for the fall of the Romanovs as the effects of a prolonged war proved to be overwhelming for the Russian Government and the people of Russia. Deaths and casualties by the millions, soaring inflation, hunger and deprivation were

  • The Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty Essay

    1043 Words  | 5 Pages

    The decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty Good morning. Today I am going to talk about the reasons for the decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty. Personally, I think the decisions made by Tsar Alexander II and Nicholas II were the main reasons for the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Firstly, I would discuss the long term causes. The reforms made by Alexander II after the Crimea Wars were the long term causes that later threatened the Tsar’s position. Tsar Alexander II’s reform

  • Romanovs Essay

    2215 Words  | 9 Pages

    What were the social, political and economic problems that challenged the Tsarist regime between 1900 and 1906? Whilst Nicholas Romanov II firmly believed in an Autocratic Russia, he did not have the character or ability to manage the political, social and economic hardships faced by the Russian empire. Intellectuals, Communists and the lower social classes were infuriated by the inflexible political structure, they were given no freedom of speech, press or a representative in parliament. This social

  • How Far Do You Agree That Ww1 Was the Main Reason for the Fall of the Tsar in March 1917 ? Essay

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    How far do you agree that ww1 was the main reason for the fall of the Tsar in March 1917 ? WW1 – Military Issues * Battle of Tannenburg August 1914 May - Dec 30,000 were killed or injured and 95,000 captured 500 guns captured, Germany only lost 20,000 people loss of morale ill-equipped = limited guns, shared guns food shortages – loss of famers 2200 railway wagons per month 1914, 1916 = 300 * Loss of Battle meant that the Russians had been driven out of Poland led Tsar