However, the question is not how loved children are, it is how well educated they are. Homeschooling provides a better and safer environment for children to learn. “Some families choose to homeschool because their local schools are plagued
Not only are there added benefits academically, but the children in full-day kindergarten work better independently which builds good study habits for the future. Although Grace Chen provides may positive points she also gives detail about the negative points too. With the cost of full-day kindergarten being so expensive many schools do not offer this to families as an option. The second article describes how spending money in a child’s early years of education is cheaper then helping a child in later years. Nicholas Johnson examines all the pros and cons of full-day kindergartens.
The students and the teachers can make use of the school day by teaching and learning new material, instead of wasting time reviewing lessons learned the previous school year. Year-round education is favorable because it improves the behavior of the students. When students attend school for nine months with very little time off, it causes he or she to get irritable and his or her attention span also decreases. As a result, students misbehave and fool around in the classroom as a way to stay entertained. The year-round schooling offers breaks, which relieve the children’s’ boredom and he or she are able to pay attention and behave properly in the class.
The other side claims that year round school is essential for some, since student often forget a lot during the summer break. Nonetheless, Year round school is definitely not the answer, because it creates family conflict, it creates social problem, and it takes away job opportunities for students during the summer. Year round schooling has been reported to create family conflict due to the change in schedule. The reason why this has become a controversy for families, because children may not be on the same schedule as their sibling. One sibling might be enjoying his or her two month break while the other has to sit in class working.
Introduction The great Frederick Douglas once said, “It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men.” The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 echoes this sentiment by its enactment of standards-based educational reform that is based on the belief that setting high expectations and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education. However, documentary filmmakers Susan and Alan Raymond doubt the effectiveness of NCLB. In their new HBO documentary titled “Hard Times at Frederick Douglas High: A No Child Left Behind Report Card,” the Raymonds observe the entire 2005 school year of Baltimore’s Frederick Douglas High School. Despite the film’s subtitle, it is a “draw-your-own conclusion” documentary. The film examines only superficially and tersely the impact of No Child Left Behind; the truth is that NCLB occupies very little of the film’s two hours.
This is what the students would particurally like, but what about the parents? What good advantages might they get out of it? In this next paragraph I will tell you why they might consider this. Wouldn't parents love not to rush on getting their work done befvore they leave work? Well with a longer school day they can actually have time to finnish their work and consentrate on it.
They're not understanding why it is so important to go to school. Schools lose a lot of money due to students cutting class. They're also missing lectures causing them to get fail classes. Schools should have harsher consequences, such as two hours of Saturday school every unexcused absence. Therefore, the students can make up the work they missed.
These include a 60-day on and 20 off and 90 days in class and 30 days out. Arguments in favor of year-round school There are a few individuals who argue for a year-round school system of some form. Proponents of increasing the actual time see it as a means of keeping up with the rest of the world. The lack of skills in math and science in particular when compared with much of the world is seen as detrimental and the result of too little time spent learning. An increase in actual total class time is perceived as a means of decreasing the amount of time
What do you see as the strengths of the paper, and what would I try to do if you were to revise it. I believe my strengths in my paper were being able to show if it is right to go to year round education, the effects year round schooling could have on students, effects on parents and if it will increase the declining academics in our schools. 5. What‘s not part of the paper that you think might help a reader understand or appreciate it more. What wasn’t put in?
Studies have shown that homework for elementary – high school should not have homework but work on some special project or reading at home after school for only a satin amount of time depending on what grade the student is in like forty minutes to two hours a day after school. Studies also show that homework can be more harmful then help full to students as they grow up. Studies show that students going to school all morning and afternoon doing work then coming home to do even more work will make them very over worked and make them lazy and they would not wont