Use of Logos: logical: Analogy: pardigm, create an analogy , positing likeness, inductive. 182 B: artistic proofs: rhetorician making them up. Plato: a few cases inform the all Aristotle: the all inform the few Rhetoric is called upon when nothing else exists: no other alternative Realm of contingent probable truth: rhetoric when no other means available. Rhetoric: whole realm of human action rely on rhetoric. Choices in every action.
By considering all their beliefs and ideologies, its plausible to say that both were right and wrong in their ‘techniques’ to achieve the same goal. Like its already known, a problem has different paths but just one answer, but the way the answer
Instead, the system as a whole determines in an important way how the parts behave. It varies from physical, biological, chemical, social, economic, mental & linguistic. Combining these two words, holistic communication is now formed. Quality interactions in communication depend a lot on how well one person understands the others needs. This element will ensure communication to be effective because the need can be met through the interaction or relationship.
Vital to any successful communication is the ability of the sender to relay the information in such a way that the recipient understands the information according to the sender’s given meaning. Through this exchange, the sender can form a common ground based on mutual beliefs, feelings, or desires with a recipient to bring a sense of unity between the two parties. However, as straightforward as this definition sounds, it has one major weakness. It assumes the sender and recipient share common attitudes, values, beliefs, behaviors, feelings, and language. The definition should also incorporate the historical and geographical context of the two parties, so as to help them better understand what is being communicated and how it is being received.
What is unwise, or wise? To understand an issue or person is to have absolute knowledge, familiarity with them whereas being wise is the ability to judge a situation accurately and be clever. In this essay, through the characters of “The Quiet American” and ‘Kaijek the Songman’, I will discuss that it can be wise and unwise to assume that we understand. The characters in both of these stories have different levels of understanding of matters, place and each other. Levels of understanding can be high or low, and are determined by the amount of knowledge they have about the issue.
Making sure you have the right facts on which to base your decision is an essential part of the decision making process. Data and information are often seen as the same thing but there are important differences between them. • Data - statistics, numbers, facts, without context. • Information - knowledge, data that has been processed to make it useful. Data is what is
Why Matheny fails to answer a question: Do nonhumans have interest? Matheny’s essay is very logically built and step by step reveals and proves to us his believes. He tries to tell us everything in the simplest forms, beginning of course with explaining what he believes in: “The principle of equal consideration of interests asks that we put ourselves in the shoes of each person affected by an action and compare the strengths of her or his interests to those of our own –regardless of whose interests they are.” He makes it clear to us that he ‘will use the word “interests” to describe whatever it is that we value here – all those things that matter to us. We can safely say we all have an interest, at a minimum, in a pleasurable life, relatively free of pain.’ If that is so, it is very logical to suppose that animals deserve to have moral consideration because they can feel pain. But this is where Matheny’s explanation faces the stumbling stone.
Do you often rank-order the items on your to-do list? Do you find yourself sometimes identifying flaws in someone else's reasoning? If these statements describe you, then you have a tendency toward being a logical learner. A person with a logical learning style may often say these phrases: * Now that really seems logical. * It just makes sense to me.
Very often, though, coherence is taken to imply something more than simple logical consistency; often there is a demand that the propositions in a coherent system lend mutual inferential support to each other. So, for example, the completeness and comprehensiveness of the underlying set of concepts is a critical factor in judging the validity and usefulness of a coherent system. A pervasive tenet of coherence theories is the idea that truth is primarily a property of whole systems of propositions, and can be ascribed to individual propositions only according to their coherence with the whole. Though this concept of truth may seem more applicable to aesthetics
* In Q4, I am aware that I can be indecisive. Although this trait can be controlled, I find that I like to make the best decisions possible with respect of all stakeholders in mind. This can be improved with having more confidence in me with risk-taking. Sometimes the answers will not always be there. Making the best decisions may come from developing evidence-based management derived from trial and error.