Overall it could therefore be argued that rather than partners becoming more equal, women now have to carry a ‘dual burden’, whereby she is responsible for two jobs of unpaid or paid labour. Factors such as patriarchy and conforming to a gender script will lead to these divisions. Secondly, it could be argued that the money management within a family has an effect on the power relations between couples. Edgell argues that the reason why men are likely to take the decisions is because they earn more; women usually earn less than their husbands, and as a result of being dependant on them, have less say in the decision making. Similarly, Michelle Barrett and Mary McIntosh additionally argue that men usually make the decisions about spending on important items.
Gender discrimination leads to psychological and emotional disturbance, resulting in demoralization and descend in performance standards. It brings down the overall performance, and fuels more discrimination, which in turn increases the number of gaps in ones work further. After Ms. Salazar had been let go from her work, she had difficulty getting back into the workforce and putting effort into the tasks she was doing. She had later lost her home and had to move into a much more affordable accommodation due to her not finding a stable job. Ms. Salazar was not able to reach the full potential of the American dream due to the gender discrimination she had experienced in her workforce and the negative aftermath it had done to her psychologically.
Women have long been considered to be part of the lower status when it comes to jobs similar to men. In Arlie Hochschild’s vies, “The feelings of the lower-status partly may be discounted in two ways: by considering them rational but unimportant or by considering them irrational and hence dismissible” (172). This “doctrine of feelings” has been seen to permeate the workforce in such a way that it becomes impossible for women to be respected when they display any sort of emotion. In this essence, women who are considered the lower class in the working environment are oppressed in two ways. The first such way is to ignore any legitimate concerns women have; the second way is to classify any emotion as unnecessary and “irrational.” Women get taken advantage of solely because society has considered them emotional, which in today’s modern society is often mistaken for being unstable.
However, some women joined the work force and would do jobs that men previously had held. Some were not forced to, but they had to work as hard as they could to support their families during this difficult time. In contrast, the writer Norman Cousins commented that there was a negative opinion on the women’s presence in the workforce despite women willing to acquire a living wage. He also stated in his book that the federal government proscribed holding government jobs by both members of a married couple, and many localities stopped hiring women whose husbands with a minimum wage (Cousins 1939). Another aspect of the Depression affecting life of women was the moral argument against working-women.
The people who work with Judith are thinking like men and women can’t apply for the same job in society. 2. Manager treating her differently because of her gender women are important in our society same as a men. In my opinion women can apply for the same work if she is qualified for it. How has this attitude affect
Women, were so unhappy without having rights and it made them feel less loved and wanted. With this theory being applied to this issue of Women’s Rights, they come out on top of the situation. It took 130 years or so for women to evolve in society. “Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the locus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes (consequences) of choosing one action/policy over other actions/policies. As such, it moves beyond the scope of one's own interests and takes into account the interests of others.” (Cavalier, 2002) With the Women’s Rights Movement, there were a lot of pros and cons that can about, mostly positives.
Occupational sex segregation is an explanation one could use to clarify the low numbers of women in coaching positions. Kane and Stangl argue that men who hire limited number of women do so to maintain their mal dominance in a field. Consequently, allowing women to freely enter a male-dominated field compromises the composition and distribution of jobs. Additionally, the authors cite marginalization as another way that occupational sex segregation takes place. Kanter’s definition of marginalization is transcended through examples that the authors provide.
Inequalities that exist in many social life areas are an indication that there are some disadvantages that women experience in choosing leisure activities (Haywood, Kew, & Bramham, 1995). The most strong disadvantage argument that have been passed across is the one suggesting that the life of a woman is so much oppressed making it very hard to see any importance of enjoying any form of leisure. Thus meaning, leisure may be a concept that is very meaningless to a woman. However, most research that have been carried out on women leisure, have shown that women do have leisure but lesser of it because they face more disadvantages than the men when it comes to leisure choices. The objective of this paper is to look at disadvantages that women experience in leisure choices.
If it is a result of implicit discrimination due to lifestyle choices, then women's lower earnings result from the fact that women typically take more time off when having children or choose to work fewer hours. If it is explicit discrimination, then the pay gap is a result of stereotypical beliefs, conscious or unconscious, from those who hire and set salaries.This graph depicts the female to male earnings ratio, median yearly earnings among full time. Some other examples of the gender gap are: Women who work part time actually earn more than men who work part
When women began to enter the major areas of the workplace in the late 19th century and 20th centuries they faced many different obstacles they would have to overturn. Since the beginning of history, women have been looked down upon by men and seen as inferior and a class below them. After women began to gain social and political rights this terrible idea of sexism was beginning to change. When women began to enter the workforce they were beginning to challenge and change many of the social norms of previous years. They were pushing for equal rights and became emancipated by their ability to work and their new social powers.