William Paley's Argument from Design

394 Words2 Pages
William Paley's Argument from Design : our world is like a watch, and watches require watchmakers, so our world must have an intelligent "watchmaker" as well- namely, God. First of all I am going to talk about William Parely's Argument from design. In this argument he points out that the watch is complicated with many parts, and yet all work together to form a working machine, he also claims that all the pieces of the watch are put together for a purpose. Pareley explains that the watch needs a maker and that watches cannot be designed by other watches, therefore some superior being must have created at least the first one. With this premise, Pareley introduces the connection between the watch and our universe. He explains clearly that if a watch needs a designer, surely the universe should need one to. He justifies the existence of God through this watch argument, so he proceed with this argument from analogy: our world is like a watch, and watches require watchmakers, so our world must have an intelligent "watchmaker" as well namely, God. In the other hand David Hume has objections about this argument, one of the objections who really caught my eye was when he said that God is not perfect which is contradictory to the nature of God. (Since he derived a contradiction from the premise, the premise itself must be false). Hume also argued that if an orderly and balanced natural world necessitates a special maker or designer, then God’s mind as it is well ordered, likewise requires a creator. Thus, this maker would similarly need another maker, and so on. The analogy between a watch and the universe is a weak analogy. 2. The teleological argument relies on a false premise, which is "order exists only in minds." If order exists only in minds, and if we don't have any examples of minds other than human minds, then we can't say God is ordered. Therefore,
Open Document