Explain how far Kenilworth Castle fits in the overall development of castles 1066 was the time when motte and bailey castles first started to appear in England which provided good defence bases for the Normans. The Normans built motte and bailey castles because they were foreign invaders and so needed protection from the Anglo Saxons as quickly as possible and motte and bailey castles were very easy and quick to build. Once William had firmly established his rule in England, he built huge stone keeps which were stronger and more durable than motte and bailey. By the time of Edward I, concentric castles were being built because it was the time of peace in England so they had more time to build larger castles. Over the centuries the purpose of castles changed therefore different features were added to castles to suit their purpose.
This transportation could have easily included people, but more importantly: weapons. Rounded, the North had about 22,000 miles of railroad compared to the 9,000 miles the South had spread their land over. Lastly, another great benefit to the North was loaded with factories that help supplied the weapons needed for fighting men. In fact, the Union contained about 90% of the nation’s industry, so they were obviously in the lead of weapon production. Some advantages for the South included their strong navy and army fleet.
Moreover, it wasn’t just a commoners revolt as a variety of classes were involved such as some nobility like Lord Darcy and the Percy’s and also gentry and priests stood against parliament. As well as this, the revolt was strengthened with the rebels holding Pontefract Castle and York. This meant that the rebels had a defendable territory and if in case of battle, the Pilgrims were ready with their own grounds which would make it more difficult for Henry to defeat the rebels when they seemed to be considerably stronger than Henry himself- this was a serious threat indeed. What glued the pilgrimage of grace together were their rebel
The Normans introduced the Motte and bailey castles to England and Wales straight after their invasion in 1066. Motte-and-bailey castles were built in Scotland, Wales and Denmark in the 12th and 13th century. By the end of the 13th century, the design was worldwide. Motte and Bailey Castles helped William gain control very fast as they were strong and because Motte and Bailey castles were made of wood they would have only took a couple days to put up.
All parts of the Earldoms were controlled by the monarch. This organised system demonstrates that there was a very clear hierarchy in pre-conquest England. This would have made the country easy to run, especially for the kings of different countries such as Cnut the Great who was also king of Denmark, Norway and parts of Sweden. This indicates that England was a well governed kingdom because the kingdom was divided and each piece of land would have a local aristocrat to manage it. However, there was one main problem to the pre-conquest system that could have caused instability and chaos to the country and to the king.
Sources 1 and 2 also present the idea that Scotland was a major threat, but Source 3 presents the idea that Scotland only posed a minor threat. All of the sources vary in terms of how much of a threat Scotland was when compared with Henry’s interests in French territory. Source 1 states that Scotland must be dealt with before Henry leaves for France, because Henry was “about to leave for France” (1) when he learned that the Scottish King James had suspicious intentions of invading England whilst Henry was away. Therefore, Henry’s foreign ambitions were at risk. However, it also states that Henry was concerned with risings in Yorkshire and Country Durham, which is where the Pilgrimage of Grace originated from.
This squashed Yorks ambitions to gain the throne for his heirs, After the announcement that the King and Somerset were to hold a council in leicester without the involvement of York and Warwick, York acted quickly to raise his army to intercept the Kings army. In some opinion this occurred because of Yorks ambitions of having power with the king and within the high council to have any chance of having royal heirs. But not only this caused conflict at the Battle of St Albans. Margaret of Anjou played a major part in the benign of conflict in England, She is believed to have convinced the king that York and Warwick were disloyal to the crown and should not be part of politics within England. With the King being weak minded in his later years it is understandable that he would have been easily manipulated.
This allegiance derives the King's authority from his inheritance and the common knowledge that this is the way the political order in the country should be determined. Henry has substituted this for his own power and become king, not from any legitimate, traditional claim but simply because he has a military superiority over the legitimate king and the desire to get rid of Richard. The usurpation of Richard II leads to serious repercussions such as an uprising of Welsh supporters of the slain King against Henry IV. However, the play additionally investigates the theme of honor and the character development of Prince Hal. The following essay will detail how far "Henry IV Part One" is a play that explores the consequences and civil
Alliance, Imperialism, nationalism and militarism were all political situations that European countries were dealing with. They were taking over each other's territories, building up their defenses and had people that were so loyal to their own nation they would do anything for their own country. This is where the assignation of Archduke Franz Ferdinand comes in. The effect of M.A.I.N help start WW1. Militarism is the principle or policy of maintaining a large military establishment.