Why We Crave Horror Movies What Stephen King is trying to say in “Why We Crave Horror Movies” is that we use horror movies to fulfill unreasonable gory fantasies that we may have sometimes but don’t really want to act on. He makes a comment by saying: “I think we are all mentally ill”. The main point Stephen King makes is telling us is that we need to get in touch with ourselves. Finding that part of ourselves that needs to be let out once in a while and horror films are an outlet to let that side of us to come out. He implies that horror films help us get in touch with those emotions that we get when we are angry but don’t really want to act on.
I somewhat agree with how “they feed the hungry monsters in our psyche”. (King, 1981) When we get angry, some people think little crazy thoughts, but it does not mean that we are going to reenact what we see. Most people are sensitive to the blood and gore they see from his movies. The effects of a horror movie have on an individual are anxiety, sleeplessness, or even phobias. We just can’t get enough of Stephen King horror movies.
How did the film’s components match with the horror genre? The “Mise en Scene” in the movie “The Exorcist” is allied most with the horror genre in that it could be unsettling for many viewers. The effect exists in evoking a medley of fear, disgust and horror. Not so much the costumes, but the choice of focus and the “mistrustful” blocking done startles. The scenes: with older artifacts in the background – subtly remind of the macabre, while again, the focus could be on ordinary talk.
Interview - King on king King on King is a collection of interviews with the horror author Stephen King. He explains a lot about horror, and why he has the needs to write it. He also tells about why other people need horror and his fascination of a kids mind. The first reason why King writes horror stories is because he is warped, he thinks that it is a necessity to be warped; because of this quote from the interview “The first reason is because I'm warped, of course” the use of the word “of course” underlines that he thinks it is a necessity. He also mentions that he thinks a lot of people are afraid to say that they are warped, but he is not.
The movie begins with a short narration by the narrator that this is one of the strangest tales ever told; with the two great mysteries of creation- life and death. He says, “I think it will thrill you,...It might even horrify you. So if
Donnie Darko shows how the monstrous can be represented or misrepresented depending on the interpretation by the viewer. This is a film filled with elements of science fiction, horror and drama but does not come under one genre. Its appeal is in its eccentric way of telling a story, and its ambiguities of both the characters and the exploration of determinism and free will, sanity and insanity, loneliness and love. However it also rejects most common conventions having the main monstrous figure -Frank the bunny- also the one responsible to get Donnie (the protagonist) ready before the world ends, thus saving the original world by causing the destruction of the tangent world. It uses the story to convey its meaning primarily through dialogue and meticulous editing and leaves the majority of the interpretation of the film up to the viewer’s imagination.
“The beauty of the dream vanished and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.” As the reader acknowledges this it give a nauseating impression towards Victor, but also a shocking undisguised impression of hatred. In chapter 11 we learn to understand Frankenstein when he narrates his flashback. “In my joy I thrust my hand
When I say Jim Carrey what films spring to your tongue? The Grinch, dumb and dumber, Ace Ventura? Maybe even a series of unfortunate events? I personally asosiate these films with an annoying, melodramatic actor, who to be honest put me off ever wanting to press the little button on the left of my remote. Its hard to say this but, I lara ferguson actually enjoyed a Jim carrey film!
However, they also appear to be linked psychologically. It can be interpreted from a Freudian perspective that the monster is Victor’s ‘Id,’ who represents and indulges in Victor’s darkest desires by transgressing moral boundaries and committing immoral acts. The creature can be seen to commit evil acts when he kills William, who is a “sweet” and “gentle” child. This destruction of innocence is an act of revenge against Victor, which arguably shows the extreme and monstrous capabilities of humans. However, the monster’s narrative allows us to see a different and perhaps more sympathetic side to the story, in which the monster attempts to “educate” William and encourage him to be his “companion and friend,” to which William “violently” rejects him for being an “ugly” “monster.” What is most startling about this prejudice is that William is just a young child and has still been corrupted by society and its discriminatory ways.
We love zombies because it is a way to express and discuss the things we are uncomfortable with, particularly government, politics, the dreadful economy and the financial institutions that literally get away with murder, and the media as means to our lack of self-identity. And why are we uncomfortable with these topics: because we once had control over our identities, and ourselves, but we have given up and lost our power. These topics make us uncomfortable because we have allowed these things to happen through our very own inaction. That inaction, may of course be a result of misunderstandings, misinformation, misguidance, among other reasons, but at the heart of it: we are the ones who allowed the government, financial institutions and media to suck all of what makes us human out of us. For Gross, however, he suggests zombies are the government or financial institutions, but I portray zombies as us - society - and only a certain few remain who have not yet