Why Science Cannot Be Fully Trusted?

1699 Words7 Pages
Why Science Cannot be Fully Trusted Scientific enquiry is widely considered the most reliable means of getting information about virtually every subject. Given its empirical base, people tend to trust science more than other disciplines such as philosophy and arts since they are often founded on widely accepted rather than empirical evidence. The idea behind science is that it should involve investigation and verification of results, and any scientific endeavor should always be subject to rigorous challenge from experiment which contain such advanced science, technology and testing experiment . However, although it has facilitated monumental improvements and changes in human life, it can nevertheless be very misleading if trusted blindly. In such cases, knowledge may end up being characterized as “findings” that have not been critically analyzed and which are fundamentally flawed and inaccurate. For example, from the article “How Science Goes Wrong”, in 2013, Amgem, a scientific researcher, discovered that only 6 out of 53 studies on cancer research could be replicated while the others varied widely from previous research. This discovered has been observed in several other instances where scientific findings that if some instances have been assumed factual cannot be replicated suggesting that there is a laxity in verifying studies and that scientific methods are imperfect and prone to theoretical or human errors. Since it can mislead people if they do not query and verify every single claim, science should not be entirely trusted because of its vulnerability to defects stemming from human error. People tend to assume that anything that has been “discovered” or “proved” is unequivocally true. In the article, “Defining Categories” by Henry Bauer, he shows that science has generally accepted by the public and achieved some successes in some fields in the

More about Why Science Cannot Be Fully Trusted?

Open Document