They put this man to death without evidence to support that he committed this crime. Also the death penalty cost lots of money, people are sometimes falsely accused, and biblical reasons don’t support this. No one should be sentenced to death because of a mistake they made in their life. A person can just be in jail for the rest of their life instead of the government paying for someone to be put to death. It is twice as much money to have the death penalty than to have someone in jail.
But that affects his wife and family more than him, so 150 years in a federal prison will have to do as a direct punishment for him. Whether or not this is a fair punishment for the crime committed should not fall on the general public. It should be a carefully calculated equation involving the amount of time the ponzi scheme was ran, the total dollar amount taken from the victims (without deducting the payouts to the early investors),
In some states, the individual must be convicted of two serious felonies for the three strikes law to apply, while in others any felonies count towards the third strike. Critics of the three strike law express many strong arguments against their harsh legal statute. Our society has ultimately had an issue with the three strikes law. Some people have said that the law “destroys the flexibility of the courts and the judge, it is unjust in certain conditions, and it adds more criminals to an already crowded and expensive criminal system”
This is costing the tax payers twenty- nine million dollars over a twenty year period (Death Penalty Information Center). There is also the cost of the many appeals process that the inmate now goes through to try to overturn their conviction. This also cost the tax payers absorb anent amount of money. Now there is the issue of the inmates that are sitting with a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. This is costing the tax payers the same amount of money.
“Capital punishment is a legal process in which a person is put to death by the state because of a (very heinous) crime he or she has committed” (Michael). Is this not murder as well? In a 2007 study given by a popular Christian magazine, many extreme religious advocates voted that they were more in favor of the death penalty than they were of abortion. It is not fair of them to be against one thing, yet in support of another. It is said that capital punishment and abortion both result in the same argument: murder.
It is supported through murder of Mr. Were where the judge of the case accused the state of trying to cover up the murder by “cover up the DNA test results”( Judge Accuses State of Cover-Up in Were Murder) Also in the case of James (Whitey) Bulger was a big time crime lord but by being an “informant….government did not vigorously pursue during his trial” (Seelye, Katharine Q) Both of the stories had ways where their connections that allowed them to not be prosecuted for a certain period of time. Though in the Bulger case his connections in the CIA granted him immunity ran out as, he was then charged with all the murders that he committed over 50 years ago. Money and connections can only get you so far. The president used his connections to not be prosecuted what he thought was indefinitely was soon found out by Elise.
Shalom gives the example of Coretta Scott King who had a husband and mother-in-law killed in an assassination. Mrs. King felt that the death penalty is unjust to humans and stands opposed to the idea (6). Shalom feels that the system of justice is infallible. He mentions how many innocent people will be executed. He got this information from a study that was done in 1987 by Stanford Law.
They believe this was a right that they were given by our Four Fathers, which is clearly not true. Yes, they have the freedom of speech but when should the freedom be taken away? What about the rights of the innocent victims and their families? Hate crimes, because of their nature will always lead to violence and this is not a freedom that people should have. In my opinion, the penalties for hate crimes should continue to be more severe than that of a regular crime because so many innocent people are injured and even killed simply because they are different.
Alberto Vasquez academic essay rough draft Death penalty Presented by AL * Sometimes there are many who are innocent and are prosecuted and found guilty for crimes one did not commit. The United States of America is among one of three other countries that has a death penalty and has misrepresented opposition to the death penalty and the way death penalty has been enforced and generally the lack of trust in the prosecutors, making a life-death decision. In the contrary killing is a wrong principle is when that killing is directly defensive, not offensive. It is a coherent position. * As of April 1996, as the death penalty in America current controversies, more than three thousand people were under death sentence in the United States, in 1995, fifty convicts were executed and more than two hundred were sentenced to death.
The number of hangings fell from an average of fifteen a year in the first half of the fifties to about four a year. However some odd decisions were still made on executions, such as Hendryk Niemasz who was executed even though he appeared to have killed someone while sleepwalking. The Homicide Act was effectively unworkable because it allowed some murder to be categorized as more serious than others. For example murders with a shotgun lead to the death penalty, while brutal strangulation following a sexual assault led to imprisonment. The liberal climate would not allow this disparity as it would have been viewed as unfair and would have been one of the factors in considering the abolition of the death penalty.