America, as Harman describes, was seemingly invincible, until its involvement in the Vietnam War. In the 1950s, France had already been at war which divided Vietnam into the North and South. France was backed by the U.S. who funded a majority of the war effort and helped take over South Vietnam. But according to Harman, “The US was trapped in a war of attrition from which there was no easy way out,” (Harman 572). He sees the Vietnam War on the whole as not only a waste of time, men, and resources for the Americans, but also a cause of “huge fissures …in US society” (Harman 572).
During the United States’ current war, the War on Terror, the Rangers are an unprecedented force controlling the pace of the fighting. Rangers are primarily on the frontlines disarming roadside bombs and other IEDs putting themselves in harms way for the preservation of
The Vietnam War was a very confusing and tough time for both the world and the United States. Many Americans did not know why exactly we were there in Vietnam for the war and for what reasons. There were many great leaders who were very influential in the Vietnam War; some were also not so great ones. Ho Chi Minh and John F. Kennedy were two presidents, who both had two completely different views that changed the war in many ways. Ho Chi Minh was President of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam
Heavy machine guns were introduced that aided in powerful superiority for frontline combat such as the M1919 which fired over 500 rounds per minute and required a 250-round belt magazine and a team of two soldiers to operate. Anti-tank weapons such as the Bazooka were introduced as well. This rocket launching power weapon required both a loader and a shooter to operate it. Tanks became more powerful and destructive while armored cars and Jeeps became dominant vehicles in the aid of transportation and armor. The US Air Force experienced major advancements in both Fighter planes as well as Bombers.
Harry Truman is an important figure in relation to Vietnam as it was him who made the decision to oppose communism throughout the world. In relation to US support for France, the Truman administration concluded that the French were invaluable allies against Communism in both Indochina and Europe, and therefore deserving of American assistance. However, many articulate Vietnamese were unhappy with French rule, which resulted in a small Vietnamese nationalist group in espouse of Communism grown up in exile under the leadership of Ho Chi Minh. Consequently, Truman offered $10 million to support the French military effort, and established a US Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) in Saigon. This assistance then increased, as by the end of the year, the US had given France $100 million, along with aircraft, patrol boats, napalm bombs and ground combat machinery.
Their main goal was to stop communism from spreading all around the world, and in Vietnam, but they destroyed their economy in the process of accomplishing their goal. America lost more than $173 billion dollars due to the cost of the war, and heavily armored machinery. If used right, these amounts of money could have benefited the American economy, and could have played a major role in world economy today. Each day, the price of the US dollar decreased dramatically. This was also a big reason why the American citizens were against the Vietnam War.
Ben Taylor John Peacock War is not for the Faint-Hearted The Vietnam War was a product of the Cold War that occurred in 1964. The war was fought between North and South Vietnam over the direction a unified Vietnam should go. America and its allies supported South Vietnam while communists supported the North, as they believed communism should be the direction Vietnam should go in. The Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred in the summer of 1964 in which several American ships were allegedly attacked by Vietnamese warships. This point is very controversial, as it appears to be only partially true.
It certainly seems that they tried to mend the damage done by appearing on public affairs programs and making speeches about how the Tet was an allied victory and a Communist defeat, but it seems that the damage had already been done.  “The Johnson administration’s public relations efforts to salvage popular support for the US Vietnam War policy in the aftermath of the Tet assault failed. Maybe the media is given the same freedom to report and access today, in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, as they were in Vietnam. It may just be that the heart of the American people today are just so hardened with hate for the people we are fighting that we just overlook the atrocities and incompetence that is reported. I am sure that looking back on it, the Johnson administration wished that it had a better handle on the media by maybe using more censorship and giving the media less access to the fighting.
The Vietminh fought for their freedom. As the Vietminh began to defeat the French, the French did not prevent the communist North Vietnamese from reaching South Vietnam. (use source #1) According to the “Statement Issued by the White House”, the President assigned an ambassador to Vietnam “to coordinate the operations of all US agencies in that country. “Since the conclusion of hostilities in Indochina, the US Government has been particularly concerned over developments in Vietnam.” Even as early as 1954, before the Vietnam war had began, the US was concerned about what was happening. The US saw that the situation in Vietnam was something that needed to be flagged and
Why did America get involved in the Vietnam War? The surrender of the French: The surrender of the French in Vietnam had important repercussions for US policy in Asia. For the USA, it was another example of the spread of communism and brought their involvement in the conflict in Vietnam. The French defeat at Dien Bien Phu, due to the lack of plans to combat the guerrilla tactics of the Vietminh, provided a reason as to why the US increased its involvement. USA’s involvement is highlighted through the extensive aid to the French as they transported ships crammed with military hardware.