Why Did Collective Security Fail to Keep the Peace Between 1920 and 1935?

1288 Words6 Pages
The League of Nations was an intergovernmental organization formed in June 1919 which came as a result of Peace Conferences. The league aimed to secure peace in Europe following the previous four years of war that terrorised the continent. There were different keys of how the League was going to resolve any future conflicts and maintain peace; the principle of collective security was perhaps the most famous idealistic idea to do so. The principle originated from the idea that peace could be preserved by countries working together- collectively- to prevent one country attacking another. Collective security would be applied if the League’s assembly was unable to solve the problem; it would impose moral pressure, then economic sanctions, to force the country that was deemed to be in the wrong to comply its decisions. However, collective security failed years after, when the League faced major conflicts years later, it started to prove the world that collective security was no longer a principle to rely on. The failure of collective security played a key role as a cause to WW2. The term collective security was coined in the 1920s, but the concept that each nation's security depended upon that of all other nations, that peace was universal and indivisible was shaped by Woodrow Wilson (U.S President) at the end of the of the World War One (1918). His idealistic idea was appreciated by many countries in Europe and was later implemented in the covenant of League of Nations at the end of 1920s. By signing the covenant, each nation was being forced to defend the other nations from aggression no matter the costs where and to do so even if they had no interest in it for themselves. This system seemed to function perfectly for few years as the League was able to maintain control and to solve some territorial conflicts that came up, however on at the early 1930s, the causes for
Open Document