When the Levees Broke

419 Words2 Pages
Aminata Sesay April 3, 2011 Film Review: When the Levees Broke by: Spike Lee The main argument in this film is the forever changed lives of the people of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. It also talks about how the occurrence of the levees breaking was not result of the hurricane, but of the failure by the government and engineers in adequately constructing an efficient barrier. I would say based on the evidence that was showed, I would agree with the arguments of the documentary. Spike Lee interviewed an abundance of people varying from different classes and genders and each seemed to say the same thing, the levees were never a priority to the United States Army Corps. The aftermath of this disaster could have been prevented if the government would have designed levees that were strong and high enough in case an event was to occur like Hurricane Katrina. New Orleans, being a hurricane prone part of this country, should not have been neglected in that manner. The documentary shows aspects of the theme of politics and class. This is shown through this film because it shows how the failure of the government affects the people. You can also take the route and correlate low class people were neglected, which cost many lives and peoples’ homes. It was argued that when Hurricane Betsey hit, the levees were blown purposely so that the water would overflow into the 9th ward (predominately poor African Americans) and protect the more expensive lake areas (predominately rich Caucasians). It is clear that class plays a major part in whether you are cared about by a government. If I was the director of the film, I would change the way that Spike Lee went about interviewing the people. I think that Lee portrayed the affects of the Hurricane Katrina on less affluent people, which made it more biased. If he showed a balance of the upper, middle,
Open Document