The problem can be easily avoided if we make simple changes. Litter on the streets draw attention, and make communities around us look bad. When we think of nature, we think of it as beautiful and clean. This is not what is seen today. There is trash everywhere: in streets, on sidewalks, and other places where it should not be.
The University of La Verne’s core values have been present in my life throughout the years. Even though my mother wanted to attend college as I did, she didn’t have the option to so and that’s why she encourages me to try my hardest in school. When my mother was young, she dreamed of attending college in the United States and getting a job so she could support her family, whereas when I was small, I didn’t think school was important. Although my mother only attended elementary school, school was one of her top priorities because she felt like it was an honor to go to school, and if you went to school, you were considered to be lucky. My mother was an over-achiever and saw education as a way of showing that she was better than most.
Tourists normally look down on panhandlers because they do not like to be harassed while they are on vacation. If they follow laws for aggressive panhandling such as staying away from ATM’s, not panhandling at night, block a passer-by’s walk way or verbally threaten a person for not giving them any money, then there would be less concerns on panhandling. Therefore, if a panhandler is minding their own business and not bothering anyone, police shouldn’t be harassing them for trying to raise money they need to survive. I believe it does violate their First Amendment Rights and it should not be banned. The local police should not be focused on arresting people not causing any harm; they should be more focused on arresting the people committing more serious
If someone lived on the outskirts of two cities, they may be forced to pay for both ‘maintenance fees’. People may also end up paying even if the aren't affected by flooding. I deem this as unfair as they are paying for something that does not affect them. Flood defences, however, are non-excludable meaning if one person uses it, it does not stop a different person using it. So, if a flood occurs, everyone in the immediate area would be safe and not just one house.
The cities could provide classy trashcans that would blend in with the rest of the beach and communities. These cans may be placed in areas right before the beach starts, and a polite sign that states that smokers will be fined if seen smoking on the beaches. Not smoking on the beaches will help the litter issue, and it will help the animals and citizens live a cleaner
The scenario indicates that the area was poorly lighted and the driver may not have had a clear view. Additionally, there is no indication that the officer effectively identified himself as a peace officer. Given the nature of the location, the driver may have assumed that the officer was a criminal intent on harming him. Third, if the officer was in fear of death or imminent serious bodily injury he would have been justified in shooting directly at the driver. Most departments do not allow warning shots, because they are dangerous and rarely have the effect of stopping behavior.
What good does Jill’s degree do then? The cartoon points out that sometimes degrees don’t even matter. If you attend college and pursue a major not currently in demand, then what good does the degree you earn do? Today, picking and choosing majors wisely is important. With the expense of college continuing to rise, most people cannot afford to pursue something they will not make money and benefit from later on.
1.2 The impact of societal Attitudes and beliefs Any type of sensory loss can cause people to experience, the ways in which society treats them differently. Individuals often believe that anybody suffering with sensory loss also have lack of understanding. Very often people raise their voice to somebody who is suffering from loss of vision. There are many simple things that people do without thinking of the impact on individuals with sensory loss. Such as parking vehicles on the pavement and not leaving room for someone who is not able to see especially if this is in their normal route and not used to anything being there.
No matter how many flyers would be sent out to residences, nor how many commercials announced that pesticide would be sprayed on a particular day there are still citizens that would have been uninformed to what was taking place. The poor citizens that do have television and the uneducated citizens that would not understand what they were reading and the harmful effects that the pesticide would have on them would be the ones typically to be outdoors when the spraying is taking place. The agricultural workers in the fields would be sprayed or would handle fruit or vegetables with the residue from the pesticide and get very ill. Killing the mosquitoes is a short term fix, when in all actuality the city needs to take the money donated and educate the citizens and tourist on how to avoid contracting the West Niles Virus. Educating people how to take care of themselves is a long term solution that will not cause irreparable damage to the
Were the police to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper? At the time of the Jack the Ripper murders, the police forces of London were inefficient and traditional. This lead to the Police force's mishandling of the Jack the Ripper case and in this respect; they were responsible for not capturing Jack. However it is also possible to say, that due to a lack of technology and funding as well the harsh conditions in Whitechapel at the time, the Police were facing a case that they could not crack. In some ways the police force were not to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper because of the harsh conditions that they had to work in.