What Are The Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

878 Words4 Pages
Articles of Confederation: Did the Articles of Confederation deserve to be replaced as the basis for the U.S. government, because they promoted states' rights or was the system of government more truly democratic and worthwhile that could benefit the Americans and society? Major issue: Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government could not control trade between the states or with foreign nations. The thirteen colonies were given too much leniency and it seemed that each state acted like a small nation. Many Americans viewed the Articles as something that only weakened the government and society as a whole. It made America seem more vulnerable to European influence and internal conflict between states. However, others were quick…show more content…
They did not believe that the Articles could support the US in the early stages as an independent nation. They also said that the Congress Confederation was ineffective and it couldn’t even raise its own funds. They criticized the idea of small independent states claiming that having a sole leader would better represent America to Europe. They also argued that there would be state rivalry between the independent states without a strong federal government. The people of each state saw themselves as citizens of their states instead of citizens of American. Those against the Articles saw this as a way to show the disadvantages and lost unity under the power of the Articles. Most of the times the states refused to obey the laws of Congress and that only worsened the relationship between states and Congress. Those opposed only wanted the Articles replaces if disunity came as a result. They wanted to show that the Articles were only separated America and not bringing US closer. Opponents also pointed to Shays' Rebellion as an example of the weakness of state governments for example the weakness of local state militias. Opponents criticized the state governments for failing to contribute funds to the Congress in order to raise a national force to put down Shays' rebellion. Opponents also countered the idea that the federal government would be more corrupt that independent states. They
Open Document