Were the Reasons for the Removal of Nikita Khrushchev as a Head of the Soviet Union Adequate?

1450 Words6 Pages
Were the Reasons for the Removal of Nikita Khrushchev as a Head of the Soviet Union Adequate? Nikita Khrushchev became First secretary of the Communist Party in 1953 after Georgi Malenkov was forced to retire. Khrushchev’s methods were generally based on Marxism-Leninism, but still different from Stalin’s; he was not so extreme and violent in his politics. Khrushchev led the Soviet Union through the Cold War, and in 1964 he was accused by the Central Committee in erratic and cantankerous behavior regarding the international affairs of the SU (Hosking, Geoffrey). The exact accusations were connected to Khrushchev’s mishandling the Cuban Missile Crisis and failure in the agricultural sector of Soviet economy (Hosking, Geoffrey). For these accusations Nikita Khrushchev spent seven years under house arrest. Did the Central Committee propose adequate reasons for the removal of the First Secretary considering the fact that Khrushchev had worked for the development of the SU in a lot of aspects that were not mentioned by his accusers? Khrushchev had indeed put the SU into danger during the Cuban Missile Crisis, but his economical reforms were considerably successful for the country’s economy. Khrushchev shocked the world by delivering his famous speech in 1956 in which he brought down the “cult of the personality” of Stalin. The First Secretary revealed a hidden letter written by Lenin containing criticism against Stalin. Khrushchev denounced the Father of Communism by talking of his violent rules and practices and especially the purges that Stalin used to get rid of his political enemies("Khrushchev's "Secret Speech,"). According to the speech Stalin had established “dictatorship and terror,” and Khrushchev accused him of “violations of the Socialist legality.” The effects of the de-Stalinization showed that the people from the Soviet Camp were not ready
Open Document