What would you say is the most powerful aspect of the Canadian political system: the Constitution, the executive, the legislative branch or the judiciary? Please explain why. Make sure you assess all four aspects in your response and indicate if you feel that there has been any change over time? As Canadians, we live in a state that offers us a federal democratic political system. It provides several elements that help in shaping our political frame.
"A national spirit was born, and now to be British was not enough; we were Canadian and could do a good job of paddling our own canoe. " Spotlight Canada (82) This was said by a Canadian soldier who had survived the Battle of Vimy Ridge. In addition, the Battle of Vimy Ridge was one of the reasons that Canada was starting to be seen as an independent country. As a result of this victory during World War One, Canada won a seat as a separate
Canada has made considerable contributions in organizations such as the UN, NATO and NORAD. The United Nations, or the UN, is an organization that promotes social and economic progress and peace world-wide. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, was formed in 1949 and was focused on protecting Western countries from the threat of invasion by Communist Nations. The North American Defence System, or NORAD, was an agreement created in 1957between Canada and the US. This agreement was designed in order to neutralize the possible threat of Soviet attack on North America.
The members of the Board of health had invested heavily on proving the idea of air quality being the greatest impact on the morbidity, and the area where the presence of cholera was expected to have the best water quality due to class of people that had lived there (Paneth, Vinten-Johansen, Brody, & Rip, 1998). Nevertheless, Snow had to face many obstacles, but his firm believe and scientific knowledge changed the view of many scientific scholar and political leaders at the
Reference Re Amendment of the Constitution of Canada The Patriation Reference Background and Quick Summary The case analyses the role of the provinces in the amending process. Their position was unclear: there was no consistent practice by the federal government of obtaining the consent of the provinces before requesting an amendment, although unanimous provincial consent has been obtained for all amendments affecting provinces PM Trudeau proposed the amendments which ultimately became the Constitution Act 1982 and asserted that, if provincial consent was not obtained, the federal government would proceed unilaterally and to requires the enactments of the amendments by the UK Parliament. These amendments had substantial effects on the power of the provinces Three provinces directed references to their Court of Appeal, asking whether there was a requirement of law that provincial consent be obtained and whether there was a requirement of convention that provincial consents be obtained. On appeal from a variety of answers, the Supreme Court held that the consent was not required as “matter of law”, but that a substantial degree of provincial consent was required as “a matter of convention” Case: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Chouinard and Lamer THE NATURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS: A substantial part of the rules of Canadian Constitution are written while another part consists of the rulers of the common law. Those parts are referred to as the law of the constitution But important parts of the constitution are nowhere to be found in the law od the constitution.
1988 was the year Canada recognized and gave freedoms to all Canadians with the Multiculturalism Act. Prior to 1988, Canada has always been considered a cultural diverse country. The history of this nation was established with the coming together of two nations and embarked the migration and settlement of Canada. With the Multiculturalism Act, Canadians from all ethnicities had the specified right to preserve their culture of origin all awhile sharing in new social experiences and matters of Canada. The Act allowed for the term “Canadian” to be personalized to ones own story, origin and experiences oppose to an enforced definition of “what is to be Canadian”.
The Canadian Commission noted a wide spread consensus in Canada on three basic principles that will be reflected in our laws. “First, the protection of human life is a fundamental value. Second, the patient has the right to autonomy and self-determination in making decisions about his medical care. Third, human life needs to be considered from quantitative and qualitative perspectives.” (Law Reform Commission of Canada, 1983). These essay will outline some other reasons why is this issue important in our society.
2. Most Western European countries have national health care programs that provide universal access. How does the National Health Insurance system, such as the one adopted by the country of Canada differ from the National Health system, such as the one structured in Great Britain? In Canada, the government finances health care through general taxes, but the actual care is delivered by private providers. The Canadian system requires a tighter consolidation of financing, insurance, and payment functions, which are coordinated by the government.
Did you know that The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was set in place in 1982? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is set in place to help protect the individual rights of Canadians. Within the Charter, Canadian citizens have many rights and freedoms, for example, the right to express their opinion, vote, move freely around Canada and to be free from discrimination. If the government enacts legislation to refute these rights and freedoms, as Canadians, we are able to take the issue to the Supreme Court of Canada to fight for our rights. Democratic rights give you the right to vote for members of the House of Commons and the provincial legislature.