Was the American Revolution Inevitable and Why or Why Not?

1309 Words6 Pages
The American Revolution was inevitable. The social, political, and economic oppression of the colonists made Americans maintain the spirit of revolution. The Tea Act and the Stamp Act made the Americans improve their beliefs of the revolution. Additionally, the proclamation by King George III disappointed Americans after their fight in the French-India War. The paper describes the events of the American Revolution that support the statement that the revolution was inevitable. The efforts of the British government to create a true empire in United States never worked well with Americans as they were unwilling to accept colonization. They started fighting for their autonomy. By the mid-19th century, the North America would have gained independence in the same way as the Jamaicans, Australia, and Canada, who were under the British colony. However, the nature of the American Revolution was inevitable (Kennedy and Bailey 213). There would have been no revolution if the British government offered the Americans an agreement of independence in the first months of War. The American colonies were big and were still growing fast making it difficult to be ruled by an island. The increase in population made the revolution a success. As most historians put it, the American independence was inevitable but the success of the revolution was not. The American colonies were increasing and developed the American culture that did not require the help of the British especially after the expulsion of the French from Canada (Kennedy and Bailey 128). The independence had existed before the revolution ideas started occupying the minds of the colonists. The British government had already given the Americans much autonomy in the past years of colonization. The act can be justified by the attempt by the Parliament to bring the colonies back from excessive independence through the Stamp Act.
Open Document