Was British Control In India Positive Or Negative?

737 Words3 Pages
Was British Control In India Positive Or Negative? Europeans imperialism in the late 19th century resulted in the carving of areas Africa and Asia into colonial empires. Imperialism is when another country comes into a foreign territory and conquers through military, economic, and political control. During the 18th and 19th centuries India was ruled by the British. The British colonized India to look for the spices, gold and silver but when they saw that Indians were fighting among themselves they eventually took control over India. The Indians then saw that the Britishers came to India for wealth but they are taking control of their land. The Britishers stole Indian things and became very rich. They asked Indians to give their land to them but Indians didn't agree with that and tried their best to get independent and free. One of the reasons as to why the British were able to conquer India was that they were already advanced in technology and they had more superior weapons and means of communication. They considered themselves more superior and higher in rank and thus they thought that they should conquer India. British control in India had both a positive and negative impact on India. On one hand it put the Indians on a standard living condition. But on the other hand it put them under the poverty line and destroyed their economy. One of the main impacts that the British control brought that was positive was that it gave the Indians the greatest human blessing… peace. Also introduced them to western education, plus kept them in modern lifestyles. Many people see the positive impact as being more significant because Britain brought infrastructure and technology to the Indian people. Romest Dutt an Indian adapted an excerpt from, The Economic History of India Under Early British Rule stated: “They have built an administration that is strong and efficient… and
Open Document