The agents were overpowered both in numbers and in firepower. Although it is tragic that two innocent FBI agents had been killed, this case was an injustice to Peltier and he did not deserve the punishment given to him. The only thing the FBI had right was that two of their agents had been killed. They had poor leads and were determined to get a conviction for the murders and Peltier was their last chance. What failed to be verified was who killed the agents.
Did Sacco and Vanzetti had a fair trial? Why not? Were they guilty of the crime? No , Sacco and Vanzetti didn’t have a fair trail as they didn’t commit any crime but they got arrested and sentenced to death just because they are anarchists and confessed that they hated the capitalism and the American system of the government. Also, the Americans who tried them are all biases and when the court case was trailed, it was the height of the red scare so all Americans were being so paranoid when they knew that a murder case had something to do with foreigners and they didn’t even find out what the truth was and just assumed that Sacco and Vanzetti were the attackers.
They were both essentially on the “wrong side” of the situations they encountered and once they realized so it was almost too late. Both characters are capable of intense hatred. When the big black man left, Olaf planned his death, and wanted revenge on him. He “learned how to hate and got pleasure out of it.” Filch got pleasure out of catching students breaking the rules and getting them in trouble. It is almost as though they are both power hungry characters.
Therefore, they plot to kill him. The brothers tell virtually everyone they meet that they are going to kill him. Most people brush it off thinking that either they are still drunk and just babbling or that they do not think the Vicario brothers are capable of murder. Initially, I thought Santiago Nasar was responsible for this tone but after reading the entire book I am not sure whether it is his fault or Angela Vicario’s. Q: Is the repetition of words, phrases or images used? What is the purpose and its effect?
Dr. Jekyll was known as a well respected man who was morally good. Edward Hyde, the evil side of Henry Jekyll is known to have a displeasing, deformed appearance- “There is something wrong with his appearance; something displeasing, something downright detestable. I never saw a man I so disliked, and yet I scarce know why” (7). Although Dr. Jekyll was honest and morally good, Mr. Hyde’s evil suppressed within in him, which caused Mr. Hyde’s ugliness and deformed appearance. Hyde was just a part of Jekyll.
I think that equality meant a lot to him and may have made the whites angry as he spoke his opinion. | He was a cheeky boy and in their eyes was disrespectful. He was also a brave strong boy that stood up for what he believed in but again in their eyes was rude. Just because he wasn’t afraid or scared of them they decided to murder him brutally. | The Bryant’s were from the South and believed that Black people were inferior and could be disrespected.
This is a prime depiction of how Macbeth is already uneasy in life and that he will turn to crime to solve a minor problem. If it is this easy then he will continue to do so and commence a vicious cycle of lying, having remorse and killing more individuals. Conversely, as time went on Macbeth thought less about the emotional well-being of his victims and began to focus more on what he was gaining. He was a very proud king. Although it was for very wrong reasons, he still displayed immense
Power/Control Type: This type are not motivated by sexual gratification but for the high of being able to control and have power over their victims. They enjoy watching their victims cower and cringe from fear. There are several motives for serial killers; these are primary motives for serial killers * Anger- they are motivated by either a particular group or society in general * Criminal Enterprise - The kill to gain a higher status or some other reward * Financial Gain – The killing is purely for financial gain, for example killing people to collect on the insurance money * Ideology – killing to promote the believes of individuals or groups * Power Thrill – killing for the sole purpose of feeling powerful * Sexual – Killing for sexual
She points out that serial killers have a wide range of issues that had lead them to killing. A few examples would be that Ted Bundy blamed the reason he killed was over pornography. As for Jeffrey Dahmer he said something was missing inside of him. Whatever the reason they become killers it should be said that they all had something wrong with them. Meaning that serial killers do not know how to feel sympathy for others, or even how to have relationships.
Recently there have been several attacks that are nationally publicized for their inconceivable cruelty. Cruelty doesn’t really capture the injustice and breeches of morality that are associated with the murders of children, defenseless men, women, and children. We- the country- is baffled with these attacks. Feeling the pressure to solve these problems on a national level, a societal level, a political level; even on our own individual levels. It is imperative to note that these attacks aren’t just gun related, but are committed using methods designed to make sure the highest number of people are hurt or killed as possible- the killers are attacking with the intent to kill people, innocent or not, on a mass level with no care for their own